It's good to see the injured party looked after - that's what insurance is for. Unfortunately, some elements of the "legal system" regard insured parties as their main source of income and take advantage of a good system to scam money where there is little or no injury. From personal experience, I can confirm that a win in court often results in a miraculous recovery for the injured party - so I'd support surveillance. Ten years seems excessive, but if the case was going to establish precedence, then it's no surprise...
__________________
.
|