|
|
10 October 2006, 09:30
|
#21
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Poole
Length: 6m +
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5
|
Station calling / called
I've always taught that the station CALLED controls the working - that was the situation on my SRC Assessors course and when I did my old VHF licence years ago and indeed the upgrade to SRC ... there's a lot of logic to that .... if I want to call you - I listen around the working channels so I know what's free then I call you. You listen around the working channels where you are and then reply suggesting a channel ... I then confirm that as OK ... then we go to that channel and I wait for you to call me. That's 3 "overs" of Channel 16 ... and on the working channel we have the protocol to avoid both speaking at once.
The other way doing it discussed here with the CALLING station controlling the operation means that there's 4 "overs" on channel 16.
Having looked at the new RYA G31 ... page 31 says "The station that has been called is officially 'in control' of the communication ...... It is now accepted best practice for the vessel that initiated the call to choose the working channel".
So that's complicated the discussion a bit more! It's accepted practice that most people don't know about rather than the "official situation". I think I'll start teaching that if I call you and you respond with a channel number I'll confirm it and see you there. If you don't respond with a channel number I'll suggest one and wait for you to confirm it. An immediate change over is not feasible as those who did the licence before this discussion will be doing it the "old" way!
Thoughts? Colin
C R Marine Training
__________________
|
|
|
10 October 2006, 11:23
|
#22
|
Member
Country: UK - Scotland
Make: HumberOceanOffshore
Length: 8m +
Engine: Volvo KAD300/DPX
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,596
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJR
... I think I'll start teaching that if I call you and you respond with a channel number I'll confirm it and see you there. If you don't respond with a channel number I'll suggest one and wait for you to confirm it. An immediate change over is not feasible as those who did the licence before this discussion will be doing it the "old" way!
Thoughts?
|
I think that is wise. Far better than insisting one way is correct but in the real world we do it the other way.
__________________
JW.
|
|
|
10 October 2006, 11:26
|
#23
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Southampton
Boat name: Darwin
Make: Ribeye
Length: 6m +
Engine: 150hp Yamaha
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 382
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJR
Thoughts? Colin
C R Marine Training
|
I think we are all saying the same thing! Common sense.
|
|
|
10 October 2006, 11:39
|
#24
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: NW& wherever the boat is!
Boat name: depends on m'mood!
Make: Humbers/15-24m cats
Length: 6m +
Engine: etec130/big volvos
MMSI: many and various
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,816
|
yep - I'll just carry on as I have been doing with common sense-and years of practical experience of using radio in the rescue services, and on my own boats from the days when we had Seafarer RT100 radios with crystals in them, to teach real world radio!
However there is also a matter as below
Quote:
Yup changed when the IMO introduced the DSC
|
The RYA G22/02 (vhf radio inc gmdss- so post dsc intro)on page 21 states
" Inter ship: the ship which is called controls communications. This is still the casewith DSC although it is helpful if the operator originating the call checks which inter-ship channels are not in use. He can then initiate the call using a free working channel. The called station may suggest a change of channel if neccessary"
|
|
|
11 October 2006, 08:56
|
#25
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Newport IoW
Boat name: Amean/Pronto/Rumbo
Make: Solent Rib Princess
Length: 7m +
Engine: 200hp Etec 260x 2
MMSI: lots of them
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,861
|
Crystal set had one of those on one of the first boats I worked on amazing how technology has moved on.
We teach our beachlifeguards the full VHF DSC course but they only use handhelds controlled by a ground station
When a Lifeguard in the 1980,s through to present day we did not have this luxury we used flags or hand signals for communication and still do as you get abit wet in a surf zone and the engine tends to be noisy so vhf communication is not so effective when on the move fine when stopped.
The old day's when the man from the Ministry came in and examined you and expected a spot on M I R P D A N IO as well as correct voice procedure are long gone.
I shall continue to teach the way I was told caller calls and nominates channel at the same time Then called responds with agreement (thats two overs on 16 and seems logical to me as cuts time down on 16 for non DSC communication)
then both switch to nominated channel and retablish contact
I shall continue to mention the older system as well though as it will take years before every one will have a DSC unit
I guess we all have a different take on how the course should be taught
but so long as its in the real world it should not be a problem should it.
__________________
Tim Griffin
RYA Freelance YMI power Powerboat and PWC instructor trainer vhf first aid sea survival Diesel engine radar and navigation instructor
|
|
|
11 October 2006, 13:46
|
#26
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Essex
Boat name: Cetacean Protector
Make: Plasteco Milano
Length: 5m +
Engine: 75hp
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 505
|
This is yet another reason to my mind why the RYA needs taking out of the VHF training process, or at least downgrading to that of one of a number of trainers, anyway.
The licence standard is set by Ofcom - therefore ANYONE should be able to teach to that standard, as long as their students can pass a properly moderated exam, and as long as instructors can verify (a) their knowledge and (b) the security of their processes.
After all, the current situation is like the Driving Standards Agency setting the driving exam, but then telling the public that only instructors working for the AA could teach them!!
I don't mind the RYA getting precious about their own courses, although personally I feel the powerboat courses need a massive overhaul, as there is no legal requirement to pass an exam and doing so is purely a matter of choice (at the moment). However, as the VHF exam IS a legal requirement, and the licensing is done by a government body, then the teaching of it should NOT be restricted to any single organisation.
Oh, and BTW, called station DOES control the working channel - try calling an MRCC and asking for a channel they don't want to use!!
Simon
__________________
|
|
|
11 October 2006, 14:07
|
#27
|
Member
Country: UK - Wales
Town: Pwllheli-North Wales
Boat name: V-ONE
Make: Highfield
Length: 8m +
Engine: Honda 250hp
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,367
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by havener
Oh, and BTW, called station DOES control the working channel - try calling an MRCC and asking for a channel they don't want to use!!
Simon
|
Simon
Coast sations allways control communications.
You have an iteresting view on things
Jono
|
|
|
11 October 2006, 14:15
|
#28
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: NW& wherever the boat is!
Boat name: depends on m'mood!
Make: Humbers/15-24m cats
Length: 6m +
Engine: etec130/big volvos
MMSI: many and various
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,816
|
strewth this thing rumbles on
Quote:
Oh, and BTW, called station DOES control the working channel - try calling an MRCC and asking for a channel they don't want to use!!
|
there has never been any disagreement in this thread that a coast station is always the controlling station and always chooses the working channel-he has a limited number of channels and may be using a remote aerial that you cannot hear. For this reason whichever way the comms start the coast station chooses the working channel.
anyone can teach the course I suppose and I did before I went and did the examiners ticket-but we got a local external examiner in and learned a lot from his methods - and that could still be done if the students all present for a direct assesment.
Just a tad unhappy that this thread that started as a really useful discussion and a good way of disseminating opinions and views on a topic to try and have everyone singing off the same song sheet moved at one point to report a centre to the rya and tell 'em what equipment they were using situation when they hadnt done anything untoward! Any way I'm off to Greece in the morning to see a client again, play with his boat, use vhf to talk with the hellenic coastguard (complete with sidearms and a book of fixed penalty ticket) drink ouzo and be away from phone and internet-tuff life!
|
|
|
11 October 2006, 15:45
|
#29
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Essex
Boat name: Cetacean Protector
Make: Plasteco Milano
Length: 5m +
Engine: 75hp
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 505
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jono Garton
Simon
Coast sations allways control communications.
You have an iteresting view on things
Jono
|
Interesting view? Quite possibly ! :-)
I just fail to see why a single, unaccountable body should be the only one allowed to certify to a standard set out by a government department!
And yes, I know CS's always control comms, but this is where the principle of "called station control" originated from years ago.
__________________
|
|
|
11 October 2006, 16:07
|
#30
|
Member
Country: UK - Wales
Town: Pwllheli-North Wales
Boat name: V-ONE
Make: Highfield
Length: 8m +
Engine: Honda 250hp
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,367
|
JK can we just close this thread? its doin my head in now
To sum it up Common Sense rules again!
|
|
|
12 October 2006, 00:57
|
#31
|
Member
Country: USA
Town: Isla de Muerta
Boat name: The Black Pearl
Length: 10m +
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jono Garton
|
Ah Mr Garton, I see your input is of the highest quality again! May I make a suggestion if its doing your head in......don't continue to read it! Savvy?
Now where's the Rum.....
__________________
|
|
|
23 October 2006, 17:31
|
#32
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: ramsgate
Boat name: Micki Dee Bee
Make: Ribcraft Seasafari
Length: 9m +
Engine: Twin 250hp Suzuki
MMSI: 235057235
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,622
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by havener
I don't mind the RYA getting precious about their own courses, although personally I feel the powerboat courses need a massive overhaul, as there is no legal requirement to pass an exam and doing so is purely a matter of choice (at the moment). However, as the VHF exam IS a legal requirement, and the licensing is done by a government body, then the teaching of it should NOT be restricted to any single organisation.
Simon
|
Not true as Ofcom are an independent body as their website states:-
"Ofcom is the independent regulator and competition authority for the UK communications industries, with responsibilities across television, radio, telecommunications and wireless communications services."
They are not in a position to control and adim the the training, hence why the why the RYA do it.
It works well.
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|