Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 28 October 2011, 11:40   #1
Member
 
thorsby's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Emsworth
Boat name: Fat Face
Make: Chasecraft 650
Length: 6m +
Engine: Suzuki DF140
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 64
3 or 4 bladed prop?

Im running a 6.5 chasecraft with a df140 on the back. Currently using a stainnless 3 bladed prop. It is a bit slow onto the plane but also revs high at top end. My question is, obviously i need a different prop but would there be any advantage of say a four bladed prop?

Cheers
__________________
thorsby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 11:51   #2
Member
 
Nathan k's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Lyndhurst
Boat name: Airborne
Make: SR4
Length: 4m +
Engine: 40hp
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 216
Send a message via AIM to Nathan k Send a message via MSN to Nathan k Send a message via Skype™ to Nathan k
4 bladed prop would mean faster plane speed, also it can decrease your fuel consumption at cruising speed? i'm not 100% if that's correct though
__________________
Nathan k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 11:56   #3
Member
 
jambo's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Girvan & Tayvallich
Boat name: Breawatch
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 5m +
Engine: Mercury 150 F/stroke
MMSI: ex directory!!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,203
RIBase
Yes u will get up quicker. But more blades equals more fuel at top end. I changed down from a high five to a basic 3 for that reason. A four would be a compromise.
J

Sent from my iPhone using Rib.net
__________________
jambo
'Carpe Diem'
Member of the ebay Blue RIB cover club
Member of SABS ( Scottish West Division)
jambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 14:21   #4
Member
 
Country: Germany
Town: StPetersburg Russia
Boat name: Ocean Devil
Make: Scorpion 8.6m
Length: 8m +
Engine: Yanmar 315hp
MMSI: 211579640
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 646
RIBase
Send a message via Skype™ to Bushrider
Hi ,
I tried on my 18ft aluminium fishing boat with F100A 4 stroke both - 3 blade of different sizes and a 4 blade as well .
I went from a 19 pitch SS to a 16 pitch SS 4 blade . RPM @ WOT was almost identically but the boat went faster on plane with the 4 blade but I lost a bit of top speed .
Higher fuel consumption @ WOT I do not know - go seldom long distances with full speed .
I have changed the 4 blade now to a 17 pitch 3 blade Ballistic and that is the best prop for my purpose - great acceleration , good top speed and RPM @ WOT sharp 6000 rpm/m .
The 4 blade I want to try next year on the Yamaha 90hp on the SR5.4 with flooding hull .
As for now I would say a better acceleration I prefer rather than a few km/h more top speed which I cannot use anyway in the rough .
__________________
Bushrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 15:22   #5
Member
 
Ribochet's Avatar
 
Country: UK - N Ireland
Town: Rostrevor
Boat name: Ricochet
Make: Redbay
Length: 7m +
Engine: Twin F115 Yams
MMSI: 235083269
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 930
Guess
__________________
Maximum Preparation - Maximum Fun
Ribochet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 16:13   #6
Member
 
Country: Germany
Town: StPetersburg Russia
Boat name: Ocean Devil
Make: Scorpion 8.6m
Length: 8m +
Engine: Yanmar 315hp
MMSI: 211579640
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 646
RIBase
Send a message via Skype™ to Bushrider
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ribochet View Post
Guess
guess WHAT ?
__________________
Bushrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 19:29   #7
Member
 
thorsby's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Emsworth
Boat name: Fat Face
Make: Chasecraft 650
Length: 6m +
Engine: Suzuki DF140
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 64
Thanks for the info guys, would I go for the same pitch on the four bladed as I'm running on the 3 or would I go smaller?
__________________
thorsby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 19:30   #8
Member
 
thorsby's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Emsworth
Boat name: Fat Face
Make: Chasecraft 650
Length: 6m +
Engine: Suzuki DF140
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 64
Nice shiny prop in your picture there ribochet!!!!!
__________________
thorsby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 19:40   #9
Member
 
Country: Germany
Town: StPetersburg Russia
Boat name: Ocean Devil
Make: Scorpion 8.6m
Length: 8m +
Engine: Yanmar 315hp
MMSI: 211579640
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 646
RIBase
Send a message via Skype™ to Bushrider
Quote:
Originally Posted by thorsby View Post
Thanks for the info guys, would I go for the same pitch on the four bladed as I'm running on the 3 or would I go smaller?
According my experience minimum 2x smaller !
That`s why I wrote on my boat the 16 pitch SS 4 blade had the same WOT rpm than the 19 pitch SS !! This is already 3x less .
Best would be if you find a dealer who will provide you a prop for testing before you purchase it !
Everything else I consider is either burning money on props which will not make you happy or looking in the magic "glass ball"

Regards - Jürgen
__________________
Bushrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 19:41   #10
Member
 
Bigmuz7's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Glasgow
Boat name: stramash
Make: Tornado
Length: 5m +
Engine: Etec 90
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,090
I think 4 only really had an effect when I got beyond 200HP. One things for sure .. it slowed me down

The best thing about the 4 was the bite it had on a hard corner, it gripped far better IMO, but that was it for me .. apart from the black magic associated with props on high output motors, on the hp I suggested above, ... I'd keep the cash trousered for some other needy event and stick with the three blader tbh .. what ever benefit you get .. it will hardly be enough and far less significant, than an underspend on a decent auto bilge pump or new VHF hand held for example that you could have used the money on

I like your avatar thorsby... a nice downhill shot .. that gives me an idea
__________________
Bigmuz7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 20:11   #11
Member
 
Ribochet's Avatar
 
Country: UK - N Ireland
Town: Rostrevor
Boat name: Ricochet
Make: Redbay
Length: 7m +
Engine: Twin F115 Yams
MMSI: 235083269
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 930
Nice shiny prop in your picture there ribochet!!!!![

Thanks - 1 off 2
In my experience the 4 bladed props have give me a lot more grip - less slippage, more stern lift and better fuel fuel consumption at cruising speed

Thanks for the info guys, would I go for the same pitch on the four bladed as I'm running on the 3 or would I go smaller?

Changing from a 3 blade to a 4 blade prop will definitely reduce your WOT rpm - I would suggest by 250 rpm. Another factor to consider is how "agressive" are the blades of your existing prop in terms of cupping and rake in relation to your proposed new prop.
__________________
Maximum Preparation - Maximum Fun
Ribochet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05 November 2011, 17:58   #12
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Newcastle-upon-Tyne
Boat name: Stancarlos
Make: Tornado 6.5
Length: 6m +
Engine: Suzuki DF150
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 15
RIBase
hi,

I have just resently gone from 19" 3 blade to 17" 4 blade stainless.

My thing is diving so involves pushing a lot of gear and people. The difference I have noticed is similar to what Ribochet is saying. I now have better stern lift and the boat planes at lower revs. Now when I am in a heavy sea I have noticed my boat doesn't get knocked back down off the plain as easy.

I don't use WOT very much but I gave it a 'blast' today and WOT throttle was almost identical in revs and speed as I was seeing with the 19".
__________________
DOCTORSHED is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:59.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.