|
10 September 2007, 11:26
|
#1
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Essex
Length: 7m +
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 17
|
Inboard or Outboard ??
I'm moving down from a sportscruiser to either a 7.5+ rib or possibly a large bowrider (wash my mouth!!). What are the pros and cons of running with either an inboard engine or an ourboard engine.....Thanks in advance.
__________________
|
|
|
11 September 2007, 11:00
|
#2
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Bucks
Boat name: Blue & Ding Dong
Make: Ribeye,SR4 & Bombard
Length: 6m +
Engine: 115,50 & 15Hp Yams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,252
|
Hi, outboard will be cheaper on running costs as servicing & fuel will be more if you stick with petrol!
Outboard will be easier to change engine if you need to, but will be in the way if you want a swim platform!
Smaller boat will loose more space with a inboard!
__________________
|
|
|
11 September 2007, 12:20
|
#3
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Salcombe, Devon, UK
Boat name: BananaShark
Make: BananaShark
Length: 10m +
Engine: 2xYanmar 260 diesels
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,225
|
My advice would be to add up the number of hours you think you'll be using the boat in a year. Then decide your regular number of passengers. Then decide how fast you want to go. Then decide what your main use will be - ie skiing, going fast, cruising etc. Then decide on a budget. Then decide on whether you are looking for new or used.
If you are going for new go to a knowledgeable boat outlet or manufacturer and give them the answers to all of the above!
In my opinion the differences are as follows:
Diesel (Inboard only): Heavier and slower, more economical, red diesel ends this year - maybe? Puts strain on outdrives if not driven "sympathetically". Generally very reliable engines. Most expensive option.
Petrol Inboard: Faster and lighter than a diesel, V8's sound great! Economy relatively poor compared to outboards and especially diesels.
Inboards take up room in the boat otherwise used for cockpit space or seating, but provide a good large area for sunbathing!
Outboards: Generally more economical, easier maintenance, good reliability, very wide choice to suit your use, easily upgraded, better resale.
Hope that helps a bit!
__________________
Cookee
Originally Posted by Zippy
When a boat looks that good who needs tubes!!!
|
|
|
11 September 2007, 13:24
|
#4
|
exspyrd trayd membir
Country: Ireland
Town: inn wiliks hed
Make: Redbay 6.5
Length: 6m +
Engine: Twin Etec 90hp
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 962
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookee
Hope that helps a bit!
|
arr yew demonstratin dat barnarnanarsharrk 770 att sowfamptun bote showw
gaRf
__________________
luk arfter numbir wan, downt stepp inn numbir too
|
|
|
11 September 2007, 13:59
|
#5
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Salcombe, Devon, UK
Boat name: BananaShark
Make: BananaShark
Length: 10m +
Engine: 2xYanmar 260 diesels
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,225
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Garfish
arr yew demonstratin dat barnarnanarsharrk 770 att sowfamptun bote showw
gaRf
|
No we're just taking one of the new 6 metre boats which will be on the South Devon Marine stand J320 right next to HMS Bounty and the Beijing Olympic display - Demonstrations can be arranged down in Devon of course!
__________________
Cookee
Originally Posted by Zippy
When a boat looks that good who needs tubes!!!
|
|
|
11 September 2007, 14:38
|
#6
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: poole
Make: ring
Length: 5m +
Engine: 150xr2
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 180
|
[QUOTE=Cookee;218245]
Petrol Inboard: Faster and lighter than a diesel, V8's sound great! Economy relatively poor compared to outboards and especially diesel
If this kind of technology ever found it's way into the marine industry sounds just perfect
http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsAr...Vectra/227483/
Nice big V8 with the economy of V6 now that would be good
__________________
|
|
|
12 September 2007, 09:13
|
#7
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Essex
Length: 7m +
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 17
|
Thanks very much for your input.......I am now leaning towards a 7.5 cobra with a 300 Suzuki. The loss of passenger space with the inboard is a real concern.
__________________
|
|
|
12 September 2007, 09:44
|
#8
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Salcombe, Devon, UK
Boat name: BananaShark
Make: BananaShark
Length: 10m +
Engine: 2xYanmar 260 diesels
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,225
|
Mercury, well Mercruiser actually make a new 100 hp petrol inboard that could make a big difference in the way we look at inboards, it is a straight 4, but canted over so that it fits into the "V" of the hull, thus giving a very low profile to the engine cover. This would make it suitable for having a low transom and a rear seat just like an outboard but without the bit hanging off the back.
For more information - http://www.mercurymarine.com/engines...ives/vazer.php
Of course you would need two for a 7.5 to 8 metre RIB, but it would be ideal for smaller boats.
__________________
Cookee
Originally Posted by Zippy
When a boat looks that good who needs tubes!!!
|
|
|
12 September 2007, 10:57
|
#9
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Mighty Penryn
Boat name: Little Joe.
Make: Avon Searider
Length: 4m +
Engine: Honda BF50
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,872
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookee
Mercury, well Mercruiser actually make a new 100 hp petrol inboard that could make a big difference in the way we look at inboards, it is a straight 4, but canted over so that it fits into the "V" of the hull, thus giving a very low profile to the engine cover. This would make it suitable for having a low transom and a rear seat just like an outboard but without the bit hanging off the back.
For more information - http://www.mercurymarine.com/engines...ives/vazer.php
Of course you would need two for a 7.5 to 8 metre RIB, but it would be ideal for smaller boats.
|
Not sure about inboards being supposedly thirstier than outboards. My last two boats having Merc 5.7ltr V8 I/B's and current a Opti 150 I don't reckon there's much difference. In fact if the Opti was hauling around as much load as my previous boats it would burn more. Having said that' I'm not a great one for studying the consumption figures. I tend to fill up, moan a bit and then try to forget about it.
__________________
|
|
|
12 September 2007, 11:05
|
#10
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Salcombe, Devon, UK
Boat name: BananaShark
Make: BananaShark
Length: 10m +
Engine: 2xYanmar 260 diesels
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,225
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mollers
Not sure about inboards being supposedly thirstier than outboards. My last two boats having Merc 5.7ltr V8 I/B's and current a Opti 150 I don't reckon there's much difference. In fact if the Opti was hauling around as much load as my previous boats it would burn more. Having said that' I'm not a great one for studying the consumption figures. I tend to fill up, moan a bit and then try to forget about it.
|
Mollers - having less HP with the Opti do you think you might be using a bit more throttle? Being heavier for the same horsepower would mean their power to weight ratio wouldn't be as good, making them less efficient .......... having said all of that there is always going to be an exception, and it might just be your case!
__________________
Cookee
Originally Posted by Zippy
When a boat looks that good who needs tubes!!!
|
|
|
12 September 2007, 14:48
|
#11
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: cornwall
Boat name: nothing
Make: rib eye 430
Length: 4m +
Engine: tatsu 50
MMSI: 666
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,915
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookee
Mollers - having less HP with the Opti do you think you might be using a bit more throttle? Being heavier for the same horsepower would mean their power to weight ratio wouldn't be as good, making them less efficient .......... having said all of that there is always going to be an exception, and it might just be your case!
|
if he used any more throttle he would need an unobtanuim lever and cable or it would snap off
__________________
|
|
|
12 September 2007, 16:10
|
#12
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Mighty Penryn
Boat name: Little Joe.
Make: Avon Searider
Length: 4m +
Engine: Honda BF50
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,872
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookee
Mollers - having less HP with the Opti do you think you might be using a bit more throttle? Being heavier for the same horsepower would mean their power to weight ratio wouldn't be as good, making them less efficient .......... having said all of that there is always going to be an exception, and it might just be your case!
|
But, the I/B boats were both 260hp giving possibly a similar power to weight ratio. Me giving the rib more welly is likely, but I still reckon that there's not much in it.
I think I'd rather be an exception than the rule.
__________________
|
|
|
14 September 2007, 14:16
|
#13
|
exspyrd trayd membir
Country: Ireland
Town: inn wiliks hed
Make: Redbay 6.5
Length: 6m +
Engine: Twin Etec 90hp
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 962
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookee
No we're just taking one of the new 6 metre boats
|
dats a shaim. wan ov mi toofy peggs iz urtin. a ryde inn dat 770 wud av lewsend itt.(an orl de uvvers az wel}
gArf
__________________
luk arfter numbir wan, downt stepp inn numbir too
|
|
|
15 September 2007, 08:48
|
#14
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Salcombe, Devon, UK
Boat name: BananaShark
Make: BananaShark
Length: 10m +
Engine: 2xYanmar 260 diesels
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,225
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Garfish
dats a shaim. wan ov mi toofy peggs iz urtin. a ryde inn dat 770 wud av lewsend itt.(an orl de uvvers az wel}
gArf
|
__________________
Cookee
Originally Posted by Zippy
When a boat looks that good who needs tubes!!!
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|