|
15 September 2002, 13:47
|
#1
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Portishead, Bristol
Boat name: "
Make: Ribcraft, Cowes Mari
Length: 5m +
Engine: Mercury 90hp 4-strok
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 600
|
Power to weight ratio
As always I smile when I read the comments about Mr Hart and his little boat....
Now it occoured to me tonight (as I sit in my Hotel room in Kuala Lumpur with a faster internet link than I get at home) people poke fun at Kieth, but maybe he has the most powerfull vessel on the forum (relativly speaking)
I have a 5.8m Ribcraft with a 90hp Mercury - Total weight (boat and engine 564Kg = 6kg/hp - Is that the right way round
Kieths SIB - well Keith can fill us in with the details
having seen him "Take off" in Cardiff Bay - this might be interesting.
Of course - this dosn't include the weight of the crew
|
|
|
15 September 2002, 15:01
|
#2
|
Member
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Hilton-of-Cadboll
Length: no boat
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,801
|
Hi Jools
You are in Kuala Lumpur and I am in Birmingham!
Well I can answer your question anyway.
I wrote the following in a thread last year entitled 'Inshore' (try the search for the full thread):
Quote:
The weight of my boat is 35 kilos not 50. This makes the weight of boat + engine 73 kilos. Thefore the hp/weight ratio is in fact 4.86 kilos per 1 hp..
|
So in fact Quicksilver is more powerfull!
Keith (yes it might be small but it does get out there) Hart
__________________
|
|
|
15 September 2002, 15:05
|
#3
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Portishead, Bristol
Boat name: "
Make: Ribcraft, Cowes Mari
Length: 5m +
Engine: Mercury 90hp 4-strok
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 600
|
Now its the turn of some of the "big boys" to own up.
Come on Brian - Is Cyanide any match for Quicksilver
|
|
|
15 September 2002, 15:58
|
#4
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Margate / Ramsgate
Boat name: Bumbl
Make: Scorpion
Length: 8m +
Engine: Yanmar diesel
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,837
|
Well...
Since i can't really compete with my current outfit i have designed a new one. It consists of my exsisting engine and a 4x2' peice of ply. Marine ply is desirable, but normal type will do.
The idea is tie ones self to said plywood, bolt engine to other side. Place small fuel container in a back-pack and see how fast you can go.
Me engine weighs 167Kg
Ply - lets say 1Kg
Fuel - don't need a lot of that - 1li = 1kg
Bolts, rope and stuff - allow another 1Kg
Total weight, 170Kg, 130HP, thats an amazing 1.3Kg/hp - anyone beat this?
I think we should call it a SNIB - Stupid Non Inflatable Boat
__________________
|
|
|
15 September 2002, 16:05
|
#5
|
Member
Country: UK - Isle of Man
Town: Peel, IOM
Length: no boat
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,511
|
I have got to do some estimating here as Cyanide is to big for ME to tow and has, therefore, never been near a weighbridge.
To the best of my knowledge it weighs about 3 tons. Call it 3000kg. With 450l of fuel thats another 450kg. Say 3450 all up (no crew). The engine is rated at 320hp (where; prop., flywheel, main shaft,-dunno). So divide 3450 by 320 equals, er, ehm, er....10.781kg/hp ? Er, which I think makes my power/weight ratio crap, right?
So as I said, how the hell Keith manages to handle all that (relative) power, I will never know!
__________________
|
|
|
15 September 2002, 16:22
|
#6
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Gosport
Boat name: April Lass
Make: Moody 31
Length: 9m +
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,951
|
Daniel, thats a better power to weight ratio than the latest 1000 cc motorcycles, add some wheels and you could lap them at Silverstone.
As a point of interest you ned about 50 hp per tonne to make a boat plane (assuming its a planning hull) but this will only achieve between 15 - 20 knots depending on hull shape, eg depth of hull width in reation to length etc. If you want to go faster than this just add more power.
__________________
|
|
|
15 September 2002, 16:25
|
#7
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Margate / Ramsgate
Boat name: Bumbl
Make: Scorpion
Length: 8m +
Engine: Yanmar diesel
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,837
|
I'd only beat them when its wet though pete!
Since motorsport has dry and wet tyres does watersport have dry props? Prehaps one of those might help?
__________________
|
|
|
15 September 2002, 18:57
|
#8
|
Member
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Hilton-of-Cadboll
Length: no boat
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,801
|
Quote:
Er, which I think makes my power/weight ratio crap, right?
|
Thanks for the offer of a boat swap Brian, but I couldn't get yours in my garage!
Keith (in your dreams) Hart
__________________
|
|
|
15 September 2002, 20:27
|
#9
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Bromley, Kent
Make: GS209
Length: 6.137
Engine: 4.3ltr 210hp Volvo Penta
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 231
|
Who has a boat plane, I have not seen many about, is that classed as a rib with the rubber floats it lands on?
Pete
__________________
|
|
|
16 September 2002, 13:00
|
#10
|
Member
Country: Canada
Town: Newfoundland
Length: no boat
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,100
|
Quicksilver
Keith, I think you are only factoring in weight of boat and engine?
I think when you factor in the weight of the crew your power to weight ratio might be a little less impressive
Blue Ice weighs 890kg (boat and engine only) so with 200hp that gives 4.45kg/hp which is marginally better than BGLS (Britains Greatest Living Sibster)'s rig!
Course if I add fuel, kit and three heavy blokes then its 6.8kg/hp which goes to prove theres lies and damn lies and then statistics!!
__________________
|
|
|
16 September 2002, 15:20
|
#11
|
Member
Country: UK - Isle of Man
Town: Peel, IOM
Length: no boat
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,511
|
OK then Keith. Own up and tell us what your P/W ratio is with you and Bill on board.
In the interest of fairness you can do the calculation assuming you haven't had breakfast yet!
__________________
|
|
|
20 April 2006, 00:28
|
#12
|
Member
Country: USA
Town: gaviota
Boat name: sr4
Make: AVON
Length: 4m +
Engine: 40hp Merc 2st
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 72
|
ouch!
if you don't count total weight( that includes weight of passengers, fuel, anchor,surfboards/dive tanks/fishing kit etc..) then you will not get a relevant result.
__________________
|
|
|
20 April 2006, 16:45
|
#13
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: poole
Make: ring
Length: 5m +
Engine: 150xr2
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 180
|
MM, not including all the water toys, and petrol, I would guess the 5.8 Ring and engine would come out around 525-550Kg, = 2.62-2.75KG/HP May be some years back even 2.38KG/HP, now all I need is a 2.5efi that should do the trick!!!
__________________
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|