Go Back   RIBnet Forums > RIB talk > Engines & props
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 24 March 2008, 16:00   #1
Member
 
martini's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: jersey
Boat name: Martini II
Make: Arctic 28/FC470
Length: 8m +
Engine: twin 225Opti/50hp 2t
MMSI: 235067688
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,030
Transom height/shaft length on twins

Can anyone advise me on how to work out the required shaft length on a deep vee hull when using twin outboards?

On a single engine set up its easy, measure from top of transom to bottom of keel and that's your shaft length. But how is the vent plate supposed to sit in relation to the hull when the hull is at 21 degrees from horizontal?

Do you put the vent plate level with the bottom of the hull on the centreline of the outboard, ie. half the vent plate is hiding behind the transom and the other half is in the water flow?

Obviously every boat is different and minor tweaks need to be made to get it just right but where is the start point?

I bought a pair of 225hp Optimax's for my Arctic 28 before I had the boat delivered. I went for 25" (XL) thinking they were too long, the plan being to mount them on jacks to lift them the extra 5". The reasons behind this were:
a) keeps the engines from getting swamped so much
b) allows me to close in the transom cut out so I don't get water spilling over into the boat so much.
Trouble is it's just dawned on me that this won't work! With the motors set back on the jacks by 5.5" and the transom closed in, the hydraulic steering cylinder etc. will foul the transom when I try and tilt! At least I guess it will, I haven't got the motors yet.

So I'm now looking at fitting the motors straight onto the transom and I've been trying to work out how much I may need to raise the transom height. Now that I've taken a tape measure to the boat, I'm now wondering if I have actually bought the correct shaft length and can just bolt them straight on!

If this is the case then I won't be able to build up the transom height to keep the water out but looking at the tide mark on the back, it looks like I have around 8" above the waterline which isn't too bad I spose.

Is this post getting too long?? Hello.....? Anyone one there....? Zzzzzz...

Ps. scanned a sketch I made of the transom, not sure how it will look when it's resized. And no, it's not to scale!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	img013.jpg
Views:	1346
Size:	26.8 KB
ID:	33610  
__________________
martini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2008, 16:17   #2
Member
 
Country: Canada
Town: Cowichan Bay
Boat name: Neptune
Make: Zodiac Hurricane
Length: 6m +
Engine: twin140 suzi 4stroke
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 203
I would fabricate an outboard extension out of aluminum. Not too many people seem to them in the UK.... They are used in Canada quite a bit. It would give you the chance to build up the transom height and it would give you about another 2' of length to the boat. It would enable you to tip the motors with no problems and get the perfect height. It also gives you more usable deck space. With a fiberglass boat it would need to bolted to the transom as well as using 5200 or sikaflex, I find 5200 much better. If you are interested I can take some pictures of both my ribs which are both done this way. One after market and one at the factory... Just a long thought.....
__________________
OceanEco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2008, 16:19   #3
Member
 
Pete7's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Gosport
Boat name: April Lass
Make: Moody 31
Length: 9m +
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,951
Why not give Barrus a ring later this week and ask what size engines they originally supplied to Halmatic for these boats. My money is on standard shaft engines though.

Pete
__________________
.
Ribnet is best viewed on a computer of some sort
Pete7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2008, 16:32   #4
Member
 
martini's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: jersey
Boat name: Martini II
Make: Arctic 28/FC470
Length: 8m +
Engine: twin 225Opti/50hp 2t
MMSI: 235067688
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete7 View Post
Why not give Barrus a ring later this week and ask what size engines they originally supplied to Halmatic for these boats. My money is on standard shaft engines though.
That certainly is a good idea, I suppose they might be more forthcoming with info than halmatic themselves!

If by standard shaft you mean long shaft (20"), I'm not so sure. If you look at my drawing you'll see I have 26.5" on the centreline of the outboard. This would be just about right for an XL if my theory is correct.
__________________
martini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2008, 16:52   #5
Member
 
Pete7's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Gosport
Boat name: April Lass
Make: Moody 31
Length: 9m +
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,951
You could be lucky, also worth asking them what the minimum distance apart you can rig the engines and what "toe in or out" they recommend because you don't want to mount them parallel.

Pete
__________________
.
Ribnet is best viewed on a computer of some sort
Pete7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2008, 17:03   #6
Member
 
martini's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: jersey
Boat name: Martini II
Make: Arctic 28/FC470
Length: 8m +
Engine: twin 225Opti/50hp 2t
MMSI: 235067688
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,030
Informative article herehttp://continuouswave.com regarding engine spacing and toe in/out for anyone interested.

Hopefully Turbodiesel will come along soon and enlighten me further
__________________
martini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2008, 17:05   #7
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Hamble
Length: 9m +
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete7 View Post
Why not give Barrus a ring later this week and ask what size engines they originally supplied to Halmatic for these boats. My money is on standard shaft engines though.

Pete
And my money would be on you drawing a blank on that one...... you'd get more sense out of Manos.

if your sketch is correct, and you were mounting on those centres, then 25'' (xl) mids would be fine, giving you cav plates 1.5'' above the running surface. After all, it's not as if your putting together a performance boat!
__________________
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt!
Dirk Diggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2008, 17:06   #8
Member
 
Country: Other
Town: San Carlos, Mexico
Boat name: INDE
Make: LOMAC 730
Length: 7m +
Engine: 200 Merc.
MMSI: Please press 1
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,688
Send a message via Skype™ to Limey Linda
Looking at the sketch, I agree with you, 25" XL outboards would be a good fit. I believe that the vent plate should be in clear water. You can always raise them an inch or ttwo later but cannot easily lower them. BTW if you do not have transom drains it would be good to position and put those in before fitting the engines. Your project seems huge compared with mine.
__________________
Running around like a head with it's chicken cut off.
Limey Linda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2008, 17:13   #9
Member
 
martini's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: jersey
Boat name: Martini II
Make: Arctic 28/FC470
Length: 8m +
Engine: twin 225Opti/50hp 2t
MMSI: 235067688
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,030
Thanks Limey, that's 2-1 to the 25" then! You say that the plate should be in clear water, but with 25", more than half of the plate will be out of the water when on the plane would it not?
__________________
martini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2008, 17:30   #10
Member
 
Country: Other
Town: San Carlos, Mexico
Boat name: INDE
Make: LOMAC 730
Length: 7m +
Engine: 200 Merc.
MMSI: Please press 1
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,688
Send a message via Skype™ to Limey Linda
Quote:
Originally Posted by martini View Post
Thanks Limey, that's 2-1 to the 25" then! You say that the plate should be in clear water, but with 25", more than half of the plate will be out of the water when on the plane would it not?
I believe that would be Ok. The alternatives are that the transom was made for XXL engines, but that is very unlikey, and 20 inch would be far too short.
__________________
Running around like a head with it's chicken cut off.
Limey Linda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2008, 23:01   #11
Member
 
martini's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: jersey
Boat name: Martini II
Make: Arctic 28/FC470
Length: 8m +
Engine: twin 225Opti/50hp 2t
MMSI: 235067688
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,030
Anyone want to buy a pair of transom jacks then?

I might have to register at boatmad for this
__________________
martini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2008, 20:22   #12
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Make: HumberOceanOffshore
Length: 8m +
Engine: Volvo KAD300/DPX
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by martini View Post
You say that the plate should be in clear water, but with 25", more than half of the plate will be out of the water when on the plane would it not?
The water rises pretty sharply after the transom and the legs will be a distance back so my money is with Mr Diggler.
__________________
JW.
jwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 March 2008, 10:29   #13
Member
 
Jono's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Over here
Boat name: S.S. Nobstick
Make: Three Wise Monkeys
Length: 3m +
Engine: 44lbs of thrust....
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwalker View Post
..... so my money is with Mr Diggler.

My vote is for the Tubby One too.. he might sound like he's talkin' bollix.... but he knows a thing or two about building/rigging boats... he's also worth consulting on any question pertaining to yer choice of a good wine too....
__________________
Jono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 March 2008, 13:38   #14
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Punta gorda Fl.
Boat name: War Machine
Make: Falcon U.S.A.
Length: 9m +
Engine: twin 250 Yamaha
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
Shaft length

You are going to need long shaft motors, I would strongly recommend an outboard bracket, it works very well, doesn't seem very popular on your side of the pond and from a functional, practical point of view not using one is shortchanging yourself and the boat. One, you can tilt the motors ALL the way up out of the water with a bracket with no clearance issues, without one I'll bet you'll have problems. Two, if you ever have problems out on the water a bracket gives you a relatively stable area to troubleshoot problems from without leaning out over the back of the boat, a huge advantage. Three, the bracket increases the effective length of the boat (rarely a disadvantage) and imho improves the performance of the boat due to offset.
As to setting it up I could probably give you some pictures and some measurements regarding motor installation, it might help, I am sure there are others on this forum who also can add plenty of input. Good luck!

I hate to be the lone voice of dissent but I think you may be too short on your
motors. I think they'll work but you might find those power heads closer to the water than you'd prefer. My boat measures 28 inches from transom (bracket lip) to keel, I have about 10 inches of clearance with the waterline at the stern. that may seem like a lot but when the boat is pitching and the motors are hanging off the back it's just enough to keep the powerheads up out of the water in most sea states. 25 may not be enough length on your boat, I hope it is but from my point of view... I don't know... Look, if they are too long raising them five inches is hardly noticed, if they are too short, what do you do?
I have 30 inch shafts on my motors.
__________________
pathalla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 March 2008, 20:23   #15
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Hamble
Length: 9m +
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by pathalla View Post
You are going to need long shaft motors,
So your saying he needs 20'' mids?
__________________
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt!
Dirk Diggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 March 2008, 21:06   #16
Member
 
martini's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: jersey
Boat name: Martini II
Make: Arctic 28/FC470
Length: 8m +
Engine: twin 225Opti/50hp 2t
MMSI: 235067688
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,030
My local Merc dealer and also Barrus who rigged the boat originally both confirm it's 25" XL shafts so pat yourself on the back whoever guessed correctly!
__________________
martini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 March 2008, 21:12   #17
Member
 
Country: Other
Town: San Carlos, Mexico
Boat name: INDE
Make: LOMAC 730
Length: 7m +
Engine: 200 Merc.
MMSI: Please press 1
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,688
Send a message via Skype™ to Limey Linda
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirk Diggler View Post
So your saying he needs 20'' mids?
I think Pat ment XL shafts- 25inches. he has 30inch shafts which is XXL.
Very confusing at the mo. martini has 25 inchers coming I believe and the dilima is wether to use the brackets or not. Even a 5 inch set back bracket should have enough clearance for the hyd. steering gear when tilted.
__________________
Running around like a head with it's chicken cut off.
Limey Linda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 March 2008, 21:47   #18
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Huntly
Make: Searider 4.7
Length: 4m +
Engine: 75 Suzuki
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 186
Have the engines arrived yet?

Have they arrived from America yet?
__________________
ALANT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 March 2008, 22:16   #19
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Hamble
Length: 9m +
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Limey Linda View Post
I think Pat ment XL shafts- 25inches. he has 30inch shafts which is XXL.
Pat's a fool then! It ain't rocket science, a transom that is approx 25'' high needs motors that are xl (25''), give or take an inch really doesn't matter in this application. As for a standoff box/setback bracket, you yanks are obsessed with them.
__________________
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt!
Dirk Diggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 March 2008, 23:26   #20
Member
 
martini's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: jersey
Boat name: Martini II
Make: Arctic 28/FC470
Length: 8m +
Engine: twin 225Opti/50hp 2t
MMSI: 235067688
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALANT View Post
Have they arrived from America yet?
They're due in a couple of weeks.

The original reason for using jacks was because I thought my shafts were too long and I could have used the jacks to raise the motors up to the correct height.

Now that I know the motors are the correct length I have the choice of using them or not. However as the jacks I've got are only 5.5" set-back they may still foul the transom. According to the Seastar website, I need 6" clearance in front of the engine mounting in order to tilt the motor fully.
__________________
martini is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 14:07.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.