|
27 October 2003, 21:24
|
#1
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: London
Make: Larson
Length: 7m +
Engine: Volvo D4 260hp DP
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 275
|
What size does Diesel become viable
Just wandering what size you feel would justify the additonal expense of a diesel engine.
__________________
|
|
|
27 October 2003, 21:28
|
#2
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: SOUTHAMPTON
Boat name: Won't get Fooled Again
Make: Ribtec
Length: 6.5
Engine: Honda 130
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 888
|
I was allways told it was about 7 metres plus, but I've seen a couple of 6.5's and the owners say they work fine. the new mercruiser lightweight diesel seems to be quite popular in a smaller boat
__________________
I need a little bit of Rhythym and a little bit of Blues
|
|
|
27 October 2003, 22:17
|
#3
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: West Sussex
Length: no boat
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,872
|
Re: What size does Diesel become viable
Quote:
Originally posted by peteb
Just wandering what size you feel would justify the additonal expense of a diesel engine.
|
Size is not the only thing you must consider but also what is the main purpose of having a diesel boat (rib)
Do you just want to go out ever so often for a spin to Cowes and back or serious ribbing like a weekend trip to France or the Channel Islands. If the latter then yes a diesel engine is the way to go
I hv a 6.3 rib with a Mercruiser 1.7 TDI and since a lot has already been said about this engine I suggest you do a search and read some of the previous threads and learn what has been already said about this particular engine and set up.
I keep my rib in Littlehampton and frequently venture out to Cowes/Yarmouth. The cost of diesel for such round trip is only about £20.00 (this is a distance over 80 miles)
Only last weekend I had a conversation with a chap who has a 6 mtr cabin cruiser with a Volvo Penta 140 HP petrol engine. He told me a trip to Brighton and back would cost him about £ 60.00
He also said he would have liked to have a diesel as this would allow him to go out more often and even make longer passages
Andre
__________________
|
|
|
27 October 2003, 23:20
|
#4
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: London
Make: Larson
Length: 7m +
Engine: Volvo D4 260hp DP
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 275
|
I have been looking at a Volvo 5.0Gxi dp, but also looked at the diffenece in price between the standard 5.0GL and a KAD32, the difference was £9,300. I was really amazed and have been trying to calculate a 'break even' point, but in the end decided that there would be a number of factors as you say to take into account to make it worth while. It is a lot of money to recoup, and a bit of loss to performance I would think.
__________________
|
|
|
27 October 2003, 23:51
|
#5
|
Member
Country: UK - Wales
Town: Barmouth
Boat name: Blue Marlin
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 7m +
Engine: Yanmar 315/Bravo 2X
MMSI: 235020218
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 827
|
There was a thread earlier on this week about a trip to France, which cost £33 in diesel opposed to £100+ for petrol, so I agree with Humper and Andre!!
It seems to be about what you want to do with your boat!! I want a reasonable performance when required, but also want to be able to go on long-ish cruises without breaking the bank. 6.5+ (ish) appears to be the break-even, but I'm still having problems getting my mind around the cost of a new 'big diesel' RIB. One manufacturer (of several I've asked for quotes) has more than doubled their quote from the website (27k to 55k+) - and the only extras I asked for were an A-frame, 2 extra seats, and an big diesel!! Oh, and craning points.
By the way, I have a honking great big diesel engine in my Land Rover...but the V8 petrol version was more...... why is that?
D...
__________________
|
|
|
28 October 2003, 01:14
|
#6
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Cippenham
Boat name: Falcon1
Make: Falcon
Length: 6m +
Engine: 115hp Mariner Four S
MMSI: 235021077
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 508
|
Good point DGR, dont see why a basic inboard deisel should be that much more than a modern high tech compact outboard.
__________________
|
|
|
28 October 2003, 08:15
|
#7
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: London
Make: Larson
Length: 7m +
Engine: Volvo D4 260hp DP
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 275
|
Thanks to all for the input, as you have mentioned it seems strange that diesel engines are so much dearer than petrol, I guess they are exploting the diesel v petrol fuel price 'while they can'. What concerns me is if the fuel price was the same or similar would I still want a diesel, I think the answer would have to be no, I would want petrol.
I would think that if the prices become similar there could be a bigger rise in the use of petrol boats and a decline in diesel, with more petrol becoming available at the pumps.
The only downside seems to be cruising range, but for some left with massive diesel engines, I think they msy struggle financialy to go cruising long range anywhere with diesel at petrol prices anyway.
__________________
|
|
|
28 October 2003, 11:17
|
#8
|
Member
Country: UK - Wales
Boat name: tbc
Make: Ribcraft (on order)
Length: 7m
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 27
|
I wish someone could answer all these questions.
as everyone has said, it all depends on what you want out of the said rib.
I have been in the same dilema, but looking long term and not wanting 50+ mph, the diesel is the way to go.
6 to 6.5 m and the general view is 1.7 mercruiser, over this and then you are looking at 7 m with Yanmar etc..
Give Jason a call at Ribcraft, they seem to be very competitive in this area.
__________________
|
|
|
29 October 2003, 12:17
|
#9
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Dorchester, Dorset
Boat name: JedEye
Make: Ribeye
Length: 7m +
Engine: Yamaha 250hpdi
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 36
|
Morning all,
Quote:
with diesel at petrol prices anyway
|
Please don't quote me on these figures, my sources may be out of date, but the theory will be the same, if I'm wrong, please feel free to correct me.
The price of Marine grade diesel (Red Diesel) should always be significantly cheaper than any Petrol available (legitimately) in the UK.
There is very little tax on Red Diesel (in 2001, this was 3%) compared to "normal" diesel (2001 45% /2003 75%). That's about £ 0.3552 p/l against £0.7779.
Based on this alone, it should ALWAYS be cheaper to run a diesel!
austen...
__________________
|
|
|
29 October 2003, 12:27
|
#10
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Devon
Boat name: White Ice
Make: Ranieri
Length: 5m +
Engine: Suzuki 115hp
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,015
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Austen
|
unfortunately not. http://rib.net/forum/showthread.php?...derv#post30800
__________________
|
|
|
29 October 2003, 12:54
|
#11
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Dorchester, Dorset
Boat name: JedEye
Make: Ribeye
Length: 7m +
Engine: Yamaha 250hpdi
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 36
|
To be honest Richard, I can't see the chancellor pouring on TAX on the red stuff.
It may rise a few percent, but both industries that use this stuff (fishing and farming) are already under massive pressure, he would be signing the go-ahead for another fuel campaign if he did.
I can't see them bringing in another grade to separate the Argi use from the marine either.
austen...
__________________
|
|
|
29 October 2003, 13:23
|
#12
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Devon
Boat name: White Ice
Make: Ranieri
Length: 5m +
Engine: Suzuki 115hp
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,015
|
Gordon *@!$#&* Brown
He's busy preparing to tax you on everything else, so why not give in to red diesel?
He needs to identify additional sources of revenue, and hit non-labour voting sectors.
Looks like stamp duty on house purchases might rise (and that'll be a politically risk one) so don't expect him to hold any affection for leisure boaters. Especially when under pressure from Brussels. And this isn't technically raising tax on red diesel, just ending an exemption.
__________________
|
|
|
29 October 2003, 13:31
|
#13
|
Member
Country: UK - Wales
Town: Barmouth
Boat name: Blue Marlin
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 7m +
Engine: Yanmar 315/Bravo 2X
MMSI: 235020218
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 827
|
So I guess the Chancellor (can't think of anything else to call him which won't get me reported to JK!!) will just mandate that pleasure craft must not use Red Diesel. Is that about right?
I guess it will need more infrastructure (pumps etc), although I guess that most ports/marinas only deal with one type of craft or another (pleasure/commercial) and if they deal with both then they would probably have more than 1 pump and tank - so unfortunately it might not be that difficult to implement it.
Mind you, policing it will probably cost more than the revenue they'd get in tax......but hey, that's FAR too logical for politics.........
Dylan...
__________________
|
|
|
29 October 2003, 13:45
|
#14
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Dorchester, Dorset
Boat name: JedEye
Make: Ribeye
Length: 7m +
Engine: Yamaha 250hpdi
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
pleasure craft must not use Red Diesel
|
That would be an interesting one! My new RIB (well, soon to be) is MCA cat3, does that mean I'm commercial or pleasure?
That would be put a spanner in the works, you'll get hundreds of people registering for MCA certificates, what's the basic one, cat5?
Anyway, doesn't bother me, ramp up the price on Diesel, I pay enough for my petrol!!
austen...
__________________
|
|
|
29 October 2003, 19:36
|
#15
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: London
Make: Larson
Length: 7m +
Engine: Volvo D4 260hp DP
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 275
|
How would they Police the red diesel in pleasure craft? I guess they would have the red diesel police dip testing tanks!!
__________________
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|