Go Back   RIBnet Forums > RIB talk > Engines & props
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 12 January 2006, 10:07   #1
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Devon
Boat name: Magnum Force
Make: Cougar R8
Length: 8m +
Engine: Verado 275HP
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 53
Which twin outboards for Revenger 29?

Phil Morris at Revenger has suggested a few options for the non-stepped hull twin outboard Revenger 29 I may be ordering next week, and here they are :-

2 x Mercury 225 Optimax
2 x Evinrude 225 E-TEC
2 x Evinrude 250 E-TEC
2 x Yamaha HPDI 250
2 x Suzuki DF250

My preference is for 2-stroke and price wise there's not a huge amount in it except for the Yamahas which are quite a bit more expensive.

I know everyone has their favourite, but what do you think? Or is it a case of any option will be fine?
__________________
Magnum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2006, 11:14   #2
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Hampshire
Boat name: Tornado
Make: Nimbus Nova
Length: 7m +
Engine: Mercury 115hp
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 477
I'd go for the twin 250 etecs...
__________________
Stormribs.com
donutsina911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2006, 12:50   #3
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: swansea
Boat name: Too Blue
Make: BLANK
Length: 8m +
Engine: Suzuki DT225
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by donutsina911
I'd go for the twin 250 etecs...
And me - if you want 4 strokes then suzuki but ETECs if I had the choice - and may as well be 250s as they weigh the same - you may not want the top speed but throttling back they will be less stressed.
__________________
codprawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2006, 12:56   #4
Member
 
Hugh Jardon's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Reading, Hants
Boat name: Juicy
Make: Sealine F43
Length: 10m +
Engine: 2 x 370hp
MMSI: TBC
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,884
check around for 2005 engines and see if you can pick up a bargain there, not sure you have to worry about cost as much as i do but every little helps, i got a stonking deal on my engine but also got some very keen down to the bone pricing, pm if you want to know who was doing some great deals



Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnum
Phil Morris at Revenger has suggested a few options for the non-stepped hull twin outboard Revenger 29 I may be ordering next week, and here they are :-

2 x Mercury 225 Optimax
2 x Evinrude 225 E-TEC
2 x Evinrude 250 E-TEC
2 x Yamaha HPDI 250
2 x Suzuki DF250

My preference is for 2-stroke and price wise there's not a huge amount in it except for the Yamahas which are quite a bit more expensive.

I know everyone has their favourite, but what do you think? Or is it a case of any option will be fine?
__________________
Hugh Jardon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2006, 12:58   #5
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Southampton
Boat name: Shiver
Make: Zodiac Medline II
Length: 6m +
Engine: Yamaha F150
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 80
Yamahas

I was told by a chap on the yamaha stand at LIbS that they were dropping there range of 2 strokes at 150hp in europe. Not sure if thats the same for the bigger engines or if that's a sign they may follow soon.. .
__________________
allegria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2006, 14:00   #6
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Length: no boat
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 332
Magnum if you live in Cheshire then you are very close to me i have an Etec 225 on my rib which I bought from Ian at Liverpool Power Boats i can only tell you they are a fantastic engine if you fancy coming over to see it you can PM. me and I would sugest talking to Ian about these engines he pointed me in the right direction
__________________
Milan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2006, 20:51   #7
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Make: HumberOceanOffshore
Length: 8m +
Engine: Volvo KAD300/DPX
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by codprawn
... and may as well be 250s as they weigh the same - you may not want the top speed but throttling back they will be less stressed.
__________________
JW.
jwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2006, 14:22   #8
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Devon
Boat name: Magnum Force
Make: Cougar R8
Length: 8m +
Engine: Verado 275HP
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 53
I'm leaning towards a pair of 225 Optis. They are well proven, light and I am told are supplied with good instrumention although not sure if this is the SC1000 system? Price is good too.
__________________
Magnum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2006, 15:20   #9
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: Southampton
Boat name: DynaMoHumm/ SRV/deja
Make: Avon8.4, 5.4 & 4.777
Length: 8m +
Engine: Cat3126 Yam 90 &70
MMSI: 42
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,562
the smartcraft system also interfaces superbly with Navman electronics.

http://www.navman.com/marine/product...aft/index.html
__________________
Here it comes again, I don't stand a chance
Soul possession, Got me in a trance
Pullin' me back to you - Deja Voodoo
Rogue Wave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2006, 15:43   #10
Member
 
Hugh Jardon's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Reading, Hants
Boat name: Juicy
Make: Sealine F43
Length: 10m +
Engine: 2 x 370hp
MMSI: TBC
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,884
i have done a lot of research on the current engines and i think you can do a lot worse than optis, they are proven as you say, Etecs are the latest technology but they are not strides ahead of optis in terms of performance, economy etc, i have reviewed quite a few reports from the usa and quite often optis come out on top for economy, equal for performance or an etec 1mph faster so i think a lot of it comes down to personal choice. For me etecs have not gained a significant advantage in terms of design and performance over the optis to warrant the risk. Personal view I know...

it seems the large 4strokes like verados are very thirsty especially at speed, very expensive, and very quiet but also not as fast as optis, that is why etec are happy to market against verados as they can perform better than verados but not optis!!!

some folks have said about the noise levels but i actually do like the noise i must say.

ask for a price for a pair of 2005 optis and look for a cracking deal, i know there are some out there, was a 2005 225 at the boat show

i purchased a 200 opti for my rib in dec

the smartcraft gauges etc are superb and feel free to ask any questions you like on em and with other engines you pay more for smartcraft gauge type functionality

also go for the gen 2 binnacle type controls and ultraflex top of the range cables

good luck
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnum
I'm leaning towards a pair of 225 Optis. They are well proven, light and I am told are supplied with good instrumention although not sure if this is the SC1000 system? Price is good too.
__________________
Hugh Jardon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2006, 16:14   #11
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: Southampton
Boat name: DynaMoHumm/ SRV/deja
Make: Avon8.4, 5.4 & 4.777
Length: 8m +
Engine: Cat3126 Yam 90 &70
MMSI: 42
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,562
have you had your Opti in the water yet Hugh?
__________________
Here it comes again, I don't stand a chance
Soul possession, Got me in a trance
Pullin' me back to you - Deja Voodoo
Rogue Wave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2006, 16:24   #12
Member
 
Hugh Jardon's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Reading, Hants
Boat name: Juicy
Make: Sealine F43
Length: 10m +
Engine: 2 x 370hp
MMSI: TBC
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,884
not yet, it is not pdi'd yet and tubes dont go on until the end of the month, but cant wait i must say



Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogue Wave
have you had your Opti in the water yet Hugh?
__________________
Hugh Jardon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2006, 16:39   #13
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: Southampton
Boat name: DynaMoHumm/ SRV/deja
Make: Avon8.4, 5.4 & 4.777
Length: 8m +
Engine: Cat3126 Yam 90 &70
MMSI: 42
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,562
did you used to run Opti's on your previous boats?
__________________
Here it comes again, I don't stand a chance
Soul possession, Got me in a trance
Pullin' me back to you - Deja Voodoo
Rogue Wave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2006, 16:48   #14
Member
 
Hugh Jardon's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Reading, Hants
Boat name: Juicy
Make: Sealine F43
Length: 10m +
Engine: 2 x 370hp
MMSI: TBC
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,884
no, is a honda on my hard boat, had suzukis, evinrudes and have a yamaha but will be my first time with an opti but have driven a few boats with optis now so like them
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogue Wave
did you used to run Opti's on your previous boats?
__________________
Hugh Jardon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2006, 16:48   #15
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Looe
Make: Delta
Length: 4m +
Engine: Mercury
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,409
I would go for the Opti's but then i would say that of course.
The other thing thats worth thinking about is what sort of back up you will get after you buy the engines. Which dealers are near you, and can you get parts quickly if you need them? etc etc. I think after sales serivce goes along way.
__________________
Turbodiesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2006, 17:21   #16
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Length: no boat
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 332
a significant advantage in terms of design and performance over the optis to warrant the risk. Personal view I know...

What risk they both as far as Iam aware come with a three year warranty
__________________
Milan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2006, 17:28   #17
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Mighty Penryn
Boat name: Little Joe.
Make: Avon Searider
Length: 4m +
Engine: Honda BF50
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,875
Surely a pair of " Silver Centurys" would be the way to go on this Revenger.
__________________
Mollers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2006, 19:01   #18
Member
 
Hugh Jardon's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Reading, Hants
Boat name: Juicy
Make: Sealine F43
Length: 10m +
Engine: 2 x 370hp
MMSI: TBC
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,884
i was looking at the suz 175 and etec 200 small block both due out now or early this year, both unproven, that was the risk i refer to. I suspect both engines will go on to be stonkers but was happy with an opti. price and backup were other good reasons to go for them

a few dealers have shyed away from etecs because of the history around evinrude over the last few years

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milan
a significant advantage in terms of design and performance over the optis to warrant the risk. Personal view I know...

What risk they both as far as Iam aware come with a three year warranty
__________________
Hugh Jardon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2006, 21:00   #19
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: West Wickham
Boat name: Aries IV
Make: Scorpion
Length: 8m +
Engine: Etec 250
MMSI: 235036477
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 273
Hugh,

You may be right about the 2.6 litre E-tecs but they look like the perfect twin engine set-up to me. Much lighter than the 3.3's and a good deal smaller, thanks to the 60 degree V configuration.

Logically, they ought to use less fuel than their bigger block cousins but no doubt someone will correct me on this!

I have the 2006 Evinrude catalogue in front of me. Weights for the 25" versions are:

250 (3.3 litre) - 238kg (534lb)

200 (2.6 litre) - 194kg (427lb)

That's a weight difference of 42kg (107lb) per engine

In a twin set-up, the smaller block engines will be over 15 stone lighter!!!

I hope this is usful info!

Chris.
__________________
Chris Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2006, 21:46   #20
Member
 
Hugh Jardon's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Reading, Hants
Boat name: Juicy
Make: Sealine F43
Length: 10m +
Engine: 2 x 370hp
MMSI: TBC
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,884
the weight saving and promise of being new technology were strong reasons to consider these engines but i would have kicked myself if they proved to be thirstier and more unreliable than an opti

plus dates on when they would be available were all over the place with nothing firmed and i did not want to be in a position of waiting till may/june for an engine and missing out on some fun

plus was not a big deal as i may go for building a bigger model at some time

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Murray
Hugh,

You may be right about the 2.6 litre E-tecs but they look like the perfect twin engine set-up to me. Much lighter than the 3.3's and a good deal smaller, thanks to the 60 degree V configuration.

Logically, they ought to use less fuel than their bigger block cousins but no doubt someone will correct me on this!

I have the 2006 Evinrude catalogue in front of me. Weights for the 25" versions are:

250 (3.3 litre) - 238kg (534lb)

200 (2.6 litre) - 194kg (427lb)

That's a weight difference of 42kg (107lb) per engine

In a twin set-up, the smaller block engines will be over 15 stone lighter!!!

I hope this is usful info!

Chris.
__________________
Hugh Jardon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 16:08.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.