Go Back   RIBnet Forums > RIB talk > Electrics and electronics
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 16 October 2004, 17:27   #21
Member
 
ashbypower's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Salisbury
Boat name: Blue C
Make: XS 600
Length: 6m +
Engine: 125hp Opti
MMSI: 235082826/235909566
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,439
JCW which Brian???

Brian
__________________
Brian C
APS Marine Centre
ashbypower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2004, 17:37   #22
JCW
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Essex
Boat name: Inflatable
Make: Zodiac
Length: under 3m
Engine: Yamaha F6
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 249
Send a message via AIM to JCW
ashbypower,
I was replying to Brian ( I mostly use the Ribnet alias , apologies for any confusion)
__________________
Regards

JCW
JCW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2004, 17:39   #23
Member
 
ashbypower's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Salisbury
Boat name: Blue C
Make: XS 600
Length: 6m +
Engine: 125hp Opti
MMSI: 235082826/235909566
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,439
I guessed so but I did'nt wish to appear rude by not answering



Brian (AP)
__________________
Brian C
APS Marine Centre
ashbypower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2004, 17:55   #24
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: swansea
Boat name: Too Blue
Make: BLANK
Length: 8m +
Engine: Suzuki DT225
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCW
Brian,
I believe the output power is 2KW. However I found this on the site.

Answer
At 08/03/2001 12:12 PM we wrote - Due to the relatively low power of leisure radar, concerns over harmful transmissions are generally not considered to be a problem as long as people are a few feet from the scanner unit (about 3 feet) and the scanner is positioned above eye level.

The following is an excerpt from our Radar handbooks discussing Radar safety.
The crucial part is " above eye level" - the point I am trying to make is that the Radome must be above head height - not only for safety but also for increased range.

Some Ribs I have seen do not fulfill such criteria and to me Radar mounted so low is a waste of time and dangerous(unless you remember to crouch down low)!!!

Of course I agree that Radar is a huge safety aid - would definitely fit it to a cabin type RIB or a commercial one with a high Radar arch!!!
__________________
codprawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2004, 17:59   #25
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: swansea
Boat name: Too Blue
Make: BLANK
Length: 8m +
Engine: Suzuki DT225
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete7

oh I would, caught out in fog or rain especially at night time I would have no hessitation in turning the radar on. Bit of an over kill for a jolly around the Solent on a sunny day, but having been caught in fog on a number of occasions its very easy to become disorientated. The problem with radar is interpriting what you are looking at, at that takes practise.

Pete
Couldn't agree more - just remember to duck if it's down low............

It is strange to think that RADAR hasn't really advanced that much since the magnetron was invented during the war - alright the displays are better and much smaller but power/range etc are still the same - also the skill required hasn't really changed that much!!! Electronics can only do so much.
__________________
codprawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2004, 21:43   #26
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Make: HumberOceanOffshore
Length: 8m +
Engine: Volvo KAD300/DPX
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,596
I seem to remember my Raymarine manual was particularly concerned about damage to eye tissue rather than brain tissue.
__________________
JW.
jwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2004, 00:11   #27
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: swansea
Boat name: Too Blue
Make: BLANK
Length: 8m +
Engine: Suzuki DT225
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,791
Personally can't afford to lose another brain cell - down to single figures now!!!
__________________
codprawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2004, 13:24   #28
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Sheerness
Boat name: TBA
Make: Parker
Length: 8m +
Engine: Mercruiser
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 114
Brian cells Radars and Ribs

Well gentlemen ,

thank you all for the information........I have decided to go for the Raymarine C120 as per our Demo cabin Rib.

To alleviate all fears about killing the grey matter The radome will be mounted high on the second A frame Mid Ship to allow for the stability and of course range.

For those who are curious to look at the A frame set up take a look at our web site www.parkerribs.com and view the Baltic 750

Any views on this twin A frame set up are also welcomed.
__________________
David B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2004, 13:44   #29
Member
 
Country: Ireland
Town: Dublin
Boat name: Platypus
Make: Parker 630
Length: 6m +
Engine: 1.7 Mercruiser DTI
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by David B
Any views on this twin A frame set up are also welcomed.
You could always get a couple of sails!!
__________________
IanE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2004, 16:19   #30
Member
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Isle of Man
Town: Peel, IOM
Length: no boat
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,511
RIBase
David B
Any chance of getting a slightly higher A-frame. It still looks a bit low to me if the brain fryers are to be believed.

Everyone else as well as David B.
I still maintain there isnt a problem. No expert has come on here to tell us that we are going to be death-rayed. The HSE police are quiet on the subject. Nobody has posted any actual anecdotal evidence of damage to humanoids.

I reckon we are OK.
__________________
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2004, 17:26   #31
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Sheerness
Boat name: TBA
Make: Parker
Length: 8m +
Engine: Mercruiser
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 114
A frame height

Thank you Brian for your input. The problem we would have in going higher is really a proportional one and that of equal weight distrubution, however I have today discussed with our electronics guys in Chatham and this is for sure a mixed debate. Their offcial viewpoint is Do not stand in front of the transmission from the radome for a indefinate period of time. Given the type of craft I have and its uses I will helm this from the seating posistion as opposed to standing up therefore absolutely plenty of height even at the helm in the standing up I am below the Radome.

Unlike the smaller Ribs i intend to "drive " in the seated posistion 90% of the time especially for extended voyages. The need to stand is not the same as for example in "platypus " my old 6.3 mt demo craft. I guess there will always be those who advocate and those who do not. At the end of the day its down to common sense.I think our central A frame system is the best compromise i have seen on a open 9mt Rib though.

David B
__________________
David B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2004, 17:58   #32
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: swansea
Boat name: Too Blue
Make: BLANK
Length: 8m +
Engine: Suzuki DT225
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian
David B
Any chance of getting a slightly higher A-frame. It still looks a bit low to me if the brain fryers are to be believed.

Everyone else as well as David B.
I still maintain there isnt a problem. No expert has come on here to tell us that we are going to be death-rayed. The HSE police are quiet on the subject. Nobody has posted any actual anecdotal evidence of damage to humanoids.

I reckon we are OK.
Obviously the risk IS small but not to be ignored all together!!!

As to evidence there is plenty if you know where to look and sort out the actual science from the hype from the luddites!!!

From the HSE

"Sensible precautions

If radar equipment is to be worked on under power in port, sensible precautions would include ensuring that:

no one is close to the scanner, ie within a few metres,
the scanner is rotating or if the work requires the scanner to be stationary, that it is directed to unoccupied areas, eg out to sea,
no one looks directly into the emission side of a slotted wave guide (open box type) scanner,
no one is able to position themselves between the output horn of the transmitter and the reflector of larger scanners,
the risk of being hit by a rotating scanner is not overlooked if work close to the installation is necessary. "


"Microwaves (RF energy at radar frequencies) can be hazardous if the intensity is sufficiently high. Microwaves are absorbed by the water in living tissue and their energy is converted to heat that may easily damage some organs, particularly the eyes, which may develop cataracts. For safety, always avoid looking directly into a scanner whether the radar is transmitting or not. It is well known that microwaves will interfere with cardiac pacemakers and it is common place to see the warning signs in public areas where microwave ovens are in use.

It has also been shown that long-term exposure to low levels of microwave radiation can induce a variety of physiological effects in small laboratory animals. The importance of these effects and their relevance to humans are not yet fully understood. Again for safety reasons, you should avoid long-term exposure and radar units should be operated only when needed for navigation or safety. When the radar is not needed, it should either be in standby mode (not transmitting) or turned off.

Obviously, the radiation levels associated with marine radar units will vary according to the particular make and model. A radar unit of three kilowatts up to approximately 0.5 watts per centimeter squared, operating in the X-band at 3-1/2 feet from and at the same height as the scanner, can be encountered. OSHA has determined that the recommended maximum safe level of exposure to microwaves is 0.2 milliwatts per centimeter squared. The average intensity can be as high as 0.8 (milliwatts per centimeter squared) when the scanner is stationary. At a distance of 7 to 10 feet from the scanner, the average intensity drops to safe levels (i.e. below 0.2 mW/cm2).

At points above or below the scanner's horizontal plane, the radiation level is lower than that measured at a corresponding point on that plane. However, it must be noted that the average radar has a rather large vertical beam width (20 to 25 degrees) and microwave radiation is beamed about 10 to 12 degrees above and below the horizontal plane. At 5 feet from the scanner and 1-1/2 foot below the scanner, the average intensity can still be in excess of the OSHA safety limit."
__________________
codprawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2004, 11:29   #33
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Sheerness
Boat name: TBA
Make: Parker
Length: 8m +
Engine: Mercruiser
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 114
Hse

Hello Mr Cod Prawn ,

What a post........you must have a degree in Microwave energy
Either way thank you for your post. I guess I must take a view though on the safety aspect re the navigational Gain and aid the set will afford to myself during the extended cruisies we do.

I trust you saw the Radar Arch set up we have and frankly there is little else one can do to take further preventative measures on a RIb .The points uyou have raised are all relative and one should as stated exercise caution when using this typeof equipment. At the end of the day its down to common sense.

I guess I touched on a emotive subject by placing this post , however i am glad to have got the feedback on the subject

One thing though I have not had much response on the Best Radar with a large screen for a open 9mt Rib. I was rather hoping there might be more of you out there who had use of Radar sets and their various functionalitys.

Hang in there Mr Cod prawn
__________________
David B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2004, 13:25   #34
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: swansea
Boat name: Too Blue
Make: BLANK
Length: 8m +
Engine: Suzuki DT225
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by David B
Hello Mr Cod Prawn ,

What a post........you must have a degree in Microwave energy
Either way thank you for your post. I guess I must take a view though on the safety aspect re the navigational Gain and aid the set will afford to myself during the extended cruisies we do.



Hang in there Mr Cod prawn
Not far off...... particle physics to be exact.

Total waste of time though - not much call for it and the wages are shit!!!

Personally I am not a lover of bits of paper - the people getting degrees these days!

That's what I love about the computer industry - bits of paper don't mean much - it is what you can DO that counts!!!
__________________
codprawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2004, 10:49   #35
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Sheerness
Boat name: TBA
Make: Parker
Length: 8m +
Engine: Mercruiser
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 114
what you can do what counts

Quote:
Originally Posted by codprawn
Not far off...... particle physics to be exact.

Total waste of time though - not much call for it and the wages are shit!!!

Personally I am not a lover of bits of paper - the people getting degrees these days!

That's what I love about the computer industry - bits of paper don't mean much - it is what you can DO that counts!!!

F**K me I am buggered then as I can not do a lot
__________________
David B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2004, 11:53   #36
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: swansea
Boat name: Too Blue
Make: BLANK
Length: 8m +
Engine: Suzuki DT225
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,791
I would FAR rather mess around with RIBs all the time!!!
__________________
codprawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2004, 13:06   #37
Administrator
 
John Kennett's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Brighton
Length: 3m +
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 7,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by codprawn
At points above or below the scanner's horizontal plane, the radiation level is lower than that measured at a corresponding point on that plane. However, it must be noted that the average radar has a rather large vertical beam width (20 to 25 degrees) and microwave radiation is beamed about 10 to 12 degrees above and below the horizontal plane. At 5 feet from the scanner and 1-1/2 foot below the scanner, the average intensity can still be in excess of the OSHA safety limit."
In that case mounting it above the console so you're right underneath it looks like a good plan!

John
__________________
John Kennett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2004, 15:45   #38
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: swansea
Boat name: Too Blue
Make: BLANK
Length: 8m +
Engine: Suzuki DT225
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Kennett
In that case mounting it above the console so you're right underneath it looks like a good plan!

John
Or maybe strapping it to your head????????????????
__________________
codprawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2004, 19:51   #39
Administrator
 
John Kennett's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Brighton
Length: 3m +
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 7,109
If it was on my head it would be fine -- would probably have quite an impressive range too. Wouldn't work so well for Rogue Wave though!

John
__________________
John Kennett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2004, 14:09   #40
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Sheerness
Boat name: TBA
Make: Parker
Length: 8m +
Engine: Mercruiser
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 114
Well what do you think of our baltic set up then

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Kennett
In that case mounting it above the console so you're right underneath it looks like a good plan!

John
John,

What is your opinion of our Baltic set up then. After much research we concluded this to be the best option on a small craft.

As you know I am also based with the RNLI at Sheerness and on our all weather lifeboat the Trent class the open radome is only just out of hands reach above our heads . The same goes for the baltic Rib.



David B
__________________
David B is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:06.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.