Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenlander
I've been able to visualise a place from a map way more than average and find I can quickly see unusual features/patterns
|
Snap!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenlander
studying the maps every time before going out to link rights of way and other routes into a good trip out minimising road use.
|
Snap!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenlander
I like old maps too and often look at areas of interest on the Scottish Uni side by side geo-reference website.
|
.
Snap again! It's nice to know that I'm not the only crazy!
I hesitate to mention it in case it wastes even more of your time, but geograph.org.uk is another interesting site: photographs linked to specific areas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenlander
Legit mapping costs are a downside
|
Yes, mapping is expensive, and I'm not sure whether it's going to get more so or less. Most serious mapping in the UK (and probably in most other places in the world) started as military endeavours (hence the "Ordnance" survey, and "Admiralty" charts), but then, to bring in funds, was sold to the public.
What's happened in the last couple of decades is that satellite technology and the internet have allowed the widespread use of commercial mapping (and although companies such as Google push their mapping as "free", I include them in the "commercial" category: if you look at all the information they keep about where you go and what you do, and all the insidious advertising that is done within the mapping itself, it is anything but free).
That puts pressure on those mapping producers who want to sell their products in the conventional way (ie you pay for them by giving up your cash, not your soul), as they now have that much more competition.
Then there is the added complication of maps to which the general public contribute eg openstreetmaps etc. I'm not sure where these will lead - but I can't see specialist mapping, like marine charts, having a major input from the public.