Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 01 April 2021, 18:57   #21
Member
 
The Gurnard's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Stirling
Boat name: The Gurnard
Make: Quicksilver
Length: 4m +
Engine: mariner 25hp 2s
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcflyyer1 View Post
Is everyone just placing the wood under the motor or are they screwing it down? I would prefer not to increase the number of holes in the transom so if I can get away with double sided tape or velcro, I'll go that route.
Hi Rcflyyer ... IMO a couple of cable ties to hold the wooden packing piece into the Outboard clamps as shown in the photo is better than screwing bits of wood to the transom top. The cable ties hold the wood permanently in place so you never forget them. You can still bolt the OB on if you wish. Only works with packing pieces that still keep the clamps on the transom plate. I only needed 15mm on the outboard in the photo to prevent spray being thrown up. Just another way of doing things

__________________
The Gurnard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01 April 2021, 19:30   #22
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: London
Boat name: Pip
Make: Excel Volante 330
Length: under 3m
Engine: Suzuki DF6A
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pikey Dave View Post
The 9.9 suzi is the same as my 20hp, it’s going to be a heavy lump for a 9.9. Dunno what the difference in price is, I’d be tempted to buy the 20hp & some 9.9 cowl stickers


Ah PD I’m looking at the £1800 (best price online) DF9.9A, same block as the 8hp, so carbureted rather than the EFI 9.9B (which I think is closer to £2k?)

Anyway I’m hijacking the thread...
__________________
“But for just a few quid more we can get the next size up...”
pumpkinking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01 April 2021, 21:50   #23
Member
 
Pikey Dave's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: South Yorks
Boat name: Black Pig
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 5m +
Engine: DF140a
MMSI: 235111389
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,178
RIBase
Quote:
Originally Posted by pumpkinking View Post
Ah PD I’m looking at the £1800 (best price online) DF9.9A, same block as the 8hp, so carbureted rather than the EFI 9.9B (which I think is closer to £2k?)

Anyway I’m hijacking the thread...


Ahhh[emoji106] I thought it was the efi.
__________________
Rule#2: Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level & then beat you with experience.
Rule#3: Tha' can't educate pork.
Rule#4:Don't feed the troll
Pikey Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02 April 2021, 11:25   #24
RIBnet admin team
 
Fenlander's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Cambridgeshire
Boat name: Nimrod II
Make: Aerotec 380
Length: 3m +
Engine: Yam 15 Tohatsu 9.8
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,998
The DF9.9A is lighter than the 20hp models but still on the heavy side for the 10hp class so if weight is a main consideration the Mercury/Mariner/Tohatsu models are better.
__________________
Fenlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02 April 2021, 11:59   #25
Member
 
Pikey Dave's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: South Yorks
Boat name: Black Pig
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 5m +
Engine: DF140a
MMSI: 235111389
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,178
RIBase
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenlander View Post
The DF9.9A is lighter....


Ahh I was talking BS....as usual

https://marine.suzuki.co.uk/outboards/df99b/
__________________
Rule#2: Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level & then beat you with experience.
Rule#3: Tha' can't educate pork.
Rule#4:Don't feed the troll
Pikey Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02 April 2021, 12:25   #26
RIBnet admin team
 
Fenlander's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Cambridgeshire
Boat name: Nimrod II
Make: Aerotec 380
Length: 3m +
Engine: Yam 15 Tohatsu 9.8
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,998
To be fair over the last 20yrs the hp at which different makes crossed over their models re weight takes some remembering... and looking up when memory fails.

The smaller 9.9 is still only 4kg less than the 20hp efi.
__________________
Fenlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 April 2021, 00:35   #27
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Sarasota, Florida
Make: Saturn
Length: 3m +
Engine: Tohatsu 9.8 HP
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 10
Don't worry about the thread taking a bit of a detour. I'll try to add more info myself about the engine and hopefully the solution that fixes the problem.

Fenlander, I will take a good look at the inside of the motor for that tube you mentioned. Salt water in the carb jets sounds horrible.

The Gurnard, that's a neat solution! I like the redundancy of having the 4 zip ties! I'll keep that in mind.

So I took the time today to assemble the boat, outboard and all. Previously, I was unaware of what an anti-cavitation plate even was, so this time I knew what I was looking for thanks to the info on these forums.

Since most people suggested running the trim at the second hole out from the transom, I set it at that and forgot about it. Upon looking at the boat today, the second trim position appears to put the motor at too much of a down angle. When I put the trim at the third position, the prop shaft appears to be level with the side tubes. Could this have been causing my spray issue?

The anti-cavitation plate is sitting around 1.75 inches below the transom. Do you think I can get away with this? For structural integrity purposes, having the clamps further down on the rigid transom would keep the motor more secure.

Also in this video (not mine), it shows that upper plate doing most of the deflecting work. The upper plate on my motor is well above the bottom of the transom.



First and third photos are trim in third position out. Second photo is trim in second position out.

Thanks for the help everyone.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0477.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	89.0 KB
ID:	136887   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0481.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	109.1 KB
ID:	136888   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0484.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	92.1 KB
ID:	136889  
__________________
rcflyyer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2021, 00:26   #28
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Sarasota, Florida
Make: Saturn
Length: 3m +
Engine: Tohatsu 9.8 HP
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 10
Took the boat for another spin with the outboard in the third trim position. Comfort while planing is improved and I no longer feel each and every single ripple on the water. Porpoising has also decreased.

I still unfortunately get water spraying up over half throttle however. The spray is being kicked up by the uppermost plate on the outboard (don't know what it's called). When looking at the motor while in the water, I see that the uppermost plate is under the water by about 3/4 inch (19mm), even though it appears to be pretty high compared to the keel in my previous photos?

Next step is to put a 3/4 inch (19mm) wooden shim under the bracket and see how that works. I'll probably end up coating the wood in penetrating epoxy, to stop mold from growing on it and spreading to my transom. Does this seem like the best option?
__________________
rcflyyer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2021, 12:35   #29
Member
 
Country: USA
Make: AB
Length: 3m +
Engine: outboard, 40hp
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 97
Sounds like you are getting closer.
Before you go crazy and paint, try it out. It may not be the correct thickness.
You can try a few paint stir sticks stacked. They usually give them out for free at hardware stores when you buy paint. You can add or remove to try different heights and they should be the correct width. Once you figure out optimal height then you can make a solid piece of whatever. I have used pieces of cut up rubber mat in the past.
__________________
babbot1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.