Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 02 August 2013, 11:27   #41
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Bristol
Make: Honwave
Length: 3m +
Engine: Mercury 15HP 2Str
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 109
Interesting - is one more healthy for the engine itself? I want the engine to last as long as possible without degrading its condition, based on that which would you suggest? The dealer is a specialist marine boat/engine company with a very good reputation so I do trust their recommendation of 100:1.
__________________
sergeant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02 August 2013, 12:26   #42
RIBnet admin team
 
Fenlander's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Cambridgeshire
Boat name: Nimrod II
Make: Aerotec 380
Length: 3m +
Engine: Yam 15 Tohatsu 9.8
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,881
As I said earlier I have the same engine as you but one year older and with a Mariner hood. I bought it from its first owner and have all the original paperwork plus manual. As the dealer has told you the correct ratio for this outboard is 100:1. However in the manual it states for commercial use 50:1 is advised.

It is quite likely with the low hours most private use outboards get it would last a lifetime on 100:1. Also bear in mind at this ratio you get minimal smoke and less chance of plug fouling if trolling at slow speeds.

So in truth anything between 50:1 and 100:1 will be fine and is a personal choice.

I run at 75:1 or 80:1.

Whatever ratio you decide on I'd advise precise measurement and sticking to a known brand oil.
__________________
Fenlander is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02 August 2013, 12:27   #43
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Sussex
Boat name: Bombard
Make: Aerotec 380
Length: 3m +
Engine: Mercury Mariner 15hp
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,486
RIBnet Forums - Search Results
__________________
Max... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02 August 2013, 13:31   #44
Member
 
bingosucks's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Nuneaton
Boat name: ribbit
Make: ring
Length: 6m +
Engine: opti 150
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 557
Marine mechanics have told me always 50-1 even on a 100-1
__________________
bingosucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02 August 2013, 14:47   #45
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Bristol
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 5m +
Engine: Yamaha
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,299
100;1 is too lean, 75.1 or 50 is the way to go,especially on unleaded. they probably want your business when the piston rings have worn down hence telling you to run it lean, if its advance marine telling you that then that figures!!
__________________
matt h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02 August 2013, 22:10   #46
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Bristol
Make: Honwave
Length: 3m +
Engine: Mercury 15HP 2Str
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt h View Post
100;1 is too lean, 75.1 or 50 is the way to go,especially on unleaded. they probably want your business when the piston rings have worn down hence telling you to run it lean, if its advance marine telling you that then that figures!!
I reckon I'll go with 75:1, sounds like a good compromise, if not a little more mathematically taxing lol.

I picked up the T38 and the engine today, it all fits VERY easily into my BMW 3 series with the rear seats folded down and I'm easily able to lift both in and out of the car, so I'm really pleased! Bought two buoyancy jackets too, now I'm looking for a VHF radio and my friend (a HAM enthusiast) has this for sale:

Two Way Radio KG-679E

He wants £40 for it, boxed, unused and brand new together with the programming cable - is this suitable for marine use, i.e. does it have the appropriate frequency?
__________________
sergeant is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 00:06.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.