|
|
05 February 2011, 19:38
|
#1
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Dorset
Boat name: Seabadger 2
Make: Delta / Ribcraft 6.8
Length: 7m +
Engine: Various
MMSI: -
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 743
|
Advice sought on changing to single outboard
My 6m chinook currently has twin 40hp mariner outboards and i´d like to upgrade to a single engine. Would a single 80hp give equivalent performance or would I need to get a larger engine as there is only 1 prop now? Also I´m hoping to change from 2 stroke to 4 stroke...
Thanks
__________________
|
|
|
05 February 2011, 19:50
|
#2
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Up Norf
Make: Avon SR4,Tremlett 23
Length: 4m +
Engine: Yam 55, Volvo 200
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,217
|
A single 80hp would give more performance than twin 40's.
Just make sure you seal the holes left from the twin installation properly.
__________________
|
|
|
05 February 2011, 19:55
|
#3
|
RIBnet supporter
Country: UK - England
Town: Dinard, Brittany
Boat name: Into the Red
Make: Osprey Vipermax
Length: 7m +
Engine: Evinrude E-tec 250HO
MMSI: 235 076 114
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,957
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by diver 1
My 6m chinook currently has twin 40hp mariner outboards and i´d like to upgrade to a single engine.
|
Fair enough, there is no need to discuss the reasons, the single v twin debate has raged at much length in the past.
Quote:
Originally Posted by diver 1
Would a single 80hp give equivalent performance or would I need to get a larger engine as there is only 1 prop now?
|
9D820 is the one to answer that really but from what he has said in the past, at these sort of HP levels, yes, twin 40s will be the equivalent of around 75hp~ish. However the fact that there means there is only one prop does mean that there is a little less grip and blade area in the water however the drag is significantly reduced.
Quote:
Originally Posted by diver 1
Also I´m hoping to change from 2 stroke to 4 stroke...
|
To have the same power as your twin 2/s you'd need at least a 90 4/ whereas a good 2/ like an etec or opti would do it for slightly less. You will no doubt be aware of the weight saving with the 2/ and the fact that modern ones have the same fuel economy/no smoke/greater efficiency than a four stroke. I imagine that your two 40s are quite light and they probably would weigh less combined than a single fourstroke of the same HP (speak to 9D280 for the exact science), wheras the modern two stroke would be less than your two engines combined and you would see much greater efficiency and retain/improve the balance of your boat which you would not if you went the 4/ route.
It can be tricky changing from twins to singles, especially when central elephants trunks and holes need to be sealed properly.
|
|
|
05 February 2011, 20:16
|
#4
|
RIBnet admin team
Country: Ireland
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,910
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gotchiguy
To have the same power as your twin 2/s you'd need at least a 90 4/ ...
|
Yes, it's well known that a single 4T-HP is worth a mere 0.88E of a 2T-HP. I'm not surprised that the manufacturers keep so quiet about it....
If you factor in the Wow Effect that you'll lose with a single and the smaller HP on 4 strokes (lets just call it PP, i.e. Pony Power) you may need to upgrade your RIB just to take a 4 stroke engine big enou...,
HEY, I'M CHANNELLING GOTCHIGIT!
Out of my scone, you pustulent wretch!
__________________
|
|
|
05 February 2011, 20:19
|
#5
|
RIBnet supporter
Country: UK - England
Town: Dinard, Brittany
Boat name: Into the Red
Make: Osprey Vipermax
Length: 7m +
Engine: Evinrude E-tec 250HO
MMSI: 235 076 114
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,957
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by willk
Yes, it's well known that a single 4T-HP is worth a mere 0.88E of a 2T-HP. I'm not surprised that the manufacturers keep so quiet about it....
If you factor in the Wow Effect that you'll lose with a single and the smaller HP on 4 strokes (lets just call it PP, i.e. Pony Power) you may need to upgrade your RIB just to take a 4 stroke engine big enou...,
|
Sorry, just the usual etec sales pitch. I'd have assumed you'd approve
|
|
|
05 February 2011, 20:20
|
#6
|
Member
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: Alderney
Length: no boat
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gotchiguy
at these sort of HP levels, yes, twin 40s will be the equivalent of around 75hp~ish
|
Very ish.
__________________
|
|
|
05 February 2011, 20:21
|
#7
|
RIBnet supporter
Country: UK - England
Town: Dinard, Brittany
Boat name: Into the Red
Make: Osprey Vipermax
Length: 7m +
Engine: Evinrude E-tec 250HO
MMSI: 235 076 114
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,957
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Channel Ribs
Very ish.
|
Please see my repeated referral to speak to 9D280 for the scientific reasoning.
|
|
|
05 February 2011, 20:22
|
#8
|
RIBnet admin team
Country: Ireland
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,910
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gotchiguy
Sorry, just the usual etec sales pitch. I'd have assumed you'd approve
|
Fair 'nuff. I'm busy selling a pair meself....
__________________
|
|
|
05 February 2011, 20:26
|
#9
|
RIBnet supporter
Country: UK - England
Town: Dinard, Brittany
Boat name: Into the Red
Make: Osprey Vipermax
Length: 7m +
Engine: Evinrude E-tec 250HO
MMSI: 235 076 114
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,957
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by willk
Fair 'nuff. I'm busy selling a pair meself....
|
Yes I saw. Your engines are mounted very far apart. I know that this is better than having them close for moment etc. I believe 1m is generally regarded as the cut off for optimum moment anyway isn't it? However most RIBs seem to have them mounted much closer together than you have yours?
|
|
|
05 February 2011, 20:37
|
#10
|
RIBnet admin team
Country: Ireland
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,910
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gotchiguy
However most RIBs seem to have them mounted much closer together than you have yours?
|
That's the result of a deep V and a 2.62m beam. Standard rigging on a Redbay, bear in mind that the Etec 90s are very slim
The crowd who commissioned mine, replaced her with this one, Déjà vu all over again, eh?
__________________
|
|
|
05 February 2011, 21:12
|
#11
|
RIBnet supporter
Country: UK - England
Town: Dinard, Brittany
Boat name: Into the Red
Make: Osprey Vipermax
Length: 7m +
Engine: Evinrude E-tec 250HO
MMSI: 235 076 114
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,957
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by willk
That's the result of a deep V and a 2.62m beam. Standard rigging on a Redbay, bear in mind that the Etec 90s are very slim
The crowd who commissioned mine, replaced her with this one, Déjà vu all over again, eh?
|
Are you going for another RIB then or as Polwart has suggested converting to the SIB on a full time basis?
|
|
|
05 February 2011, 22:03
|
#12
|
RIBnet admin team
Country: Ireland
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,910
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gotchiguy
...Polwart has suggested converting to the SIB on a full time basis?
|
__________________
|
|
|
05 February 2011, 22:22
|
#13
|
RIBnet supporter
Country: UK - England
Town: Dinard, Brittany
Boat name: Into the Red
Make: Osprey Vipermax
Length: 7m +
Engine: Evinrude E-tec 250HO
MMSI: 235 076 114
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,957
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by willk
|
I'm glad to hear it!!
|
|
|
06 February 2011, 09:58
|
#14
|
Member
Country: Other
Town: Stanley, Falkland Is
Boat name: Seawolf
Make: Osprey Vipermax 5.8
Length: 5m +
Engine: Etec 150
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,726
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by willk
That's the result of a deep V and a 2.62m beam. Standard rigging on a Redbay, bear in mind that the Etec 90s are very slim
The crowd who commissioned mine, replaced her with this one, Déjà vu all over again, eh?
|
If they carry on heading towards that rock at full moo they're going to need another one in about 5 seconds
Anyway mr willk I have a bone to pick with you - why didn't you sell your boat last year
__________________
A Boat is a hole in the water, surrounded by fibreglass, into which you throw money...
Sent from my Computer, using a keyboard and mouse
|
|
|
06 February 2011, 11:02
|
#15
|
Member
Country: UK - Wales
Town: West Wales
Make: Vipermax 5.8, SR4.7
Length: 5m +
Engine: 150 Opti, F50EFi
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,299
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gotchiguy
Fair enough, there is no need to discuss the reasons, the single v twin debate has raged at much length in the past.
9D820 is the one to answer that really but from what he has said in the past, at these sort of HP levels, yes, twin 40s will be the equivalent of around 75hp~ish. However the fact that there means there is only one prop does mean that there is a little less grip and blade area in the water however the drag is significantly reduced.
To have the same power as your twin 2/s you'd need at least a 90 4/ whereas a good 2/ like an etec or opti would do it for slightly less. You will no doubt be aware of the weight saving with the 2/ and the fact that modern ones have the same fuel economy/no smoke/greater efficiency than a four stroke. I imagine that your two 40s are quite light and they probably would weigh less combined than a single fourstroke of the same HP (speak to 9D280 for the exact science), wheras the modern two stroke would be less than your two engines combined and you would see much greater efficiency and retain/improve the balance of your boat which you would not if you went the 4/ route.
It can be tricky changing from twins to singles, especially when central elephants trunks and holes need to be sealed properly.
|
The OP ought to pay little regard to this load of bollox.
__________________
|
|
|
06 February 2011, 11:07
|
#16
|
RIBnet admin team
Country: Ireland
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,910
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Downhilldai
The OP ought to pay little regard to this load of bollox.
|
I figured that unless he'd been underwater since May last, he probably got the general picture there...
__________________
|
|
|
06 February 2011, 11:20
|
#17
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: South Yorks
Boat name: Black Pig
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 5m +
Engine: DF140a
MMSI: 235111389
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,178
|
A 6m Chinhook with only 80-90hp on the back of any combination/flavour, sounds a bit weedy to me, especially for carrying divers. Stick a single 150 on the back
__________________
Rule#2: Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level & then beat you with experience.
Rule#3: Tha' can't educate pork.
Rule#4: Don't feed the troll
|
|
|
06 February 2011, 11:36
|
#18
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Thornaby
Boat name: Storm
Make: Humber Ocean Pro 6.5
Length: 6m +
Engine: Suzuki DF 150
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 355
|
i have a 5.3 with extra large tubes high bow and deep 'v' with an evinrude 115!!! goes like stink !!! and very efficient when eased back!
__________________
|
|
|
06 February 2011, 11:41
|
#19
|
RIBnet admin team
Country: Ireland
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,910
|
Our old dive club 6.1 had/has the same 115 ficht. She fairly clipped along when lightly loaded, but a full compliment of divers (6-8) and kit meant that she was at WOT most of the time in the mid 20s
For 4 divers, I'd say 115 was enough, but 150 would have a big smile factor
__________________
|
|
|
06 February 2011, 14:40
|
#20
|
Member
Country: UK - England
Town: Thornaby
Boat name: Storm
Make: Humber Ocean Pro 6.5
Length: 6m +
Engine: Suzuki DF 150
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 355
|
would that have had the right prop on? i've seen the same engine on a ocean pro 6.3 with 4 divers doing 43 ish kt's! even though i have been in boats all my life i'm just getting to grips with different props abnd how much better they can make things
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|