Go Back   RIBnet Forums > RIB talk > RIBs & ribbing
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 11 June 2006, 12:44   #1
Member
 
Country: Other
Town: Stanley, Falkland Is
Boat name: Seawolf
Make: Osprey Vipermax 5.8
Length: 5m +
Engine: Etec 150
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,726
Effect of hull shape on speed

Looking at the "speed survey" thread it is interesting to see the variations. In other words quite a few of you b&ggers are faster than me with a similar boat size/hp

I think some of it may be due to the prop (only a 17" prop on at the moment though a 19" is on order) but - how much difference does something like whether the hull is a shallow or deep V make? From what I have read in the few months I have been on here, it seems that hulls are either optimised for rough water (deep V) or speed (shallow V) and juggling the two is a bit of a trade off, but how much difference does it actually make in terms of knots? 5kt? 10kt? 2kt?

Just curious really, rough water is the dominant requirement for this part of the world anyway so no plans to change as the Humber seems to be the right sort of design for the conditions here - I have been out in something with a fairly shallow V hull and it was like going back to leaf springs

Discuss
__________________
BogMonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2006, 17:26   #2
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Oakland CA
Length: 3m +
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by BogMonster
how much difference does something like whether the hull is a shallow or deep V make?
I'm thinking pretty substantial. A shallow V will plane better (so should be faster for a given power input), but will pound more in swell or chop.

Also, I believe that beam makes a pretty big difference, too. Narrower boats will be faster than wider ones.

Guesswork on my part, though.

jky
__________________
jyasaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2006, 21:43   #3
Member
 
Country: Other
Town: Stanley, Falkland Is
Boat name: Seawolf
Make: Osprey Vipermax 5.8
Length: 5m +
Engine: Etec 150
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,726
Me too. I should have made the question more explicit I suppose.

Say for instance you had a 5.8m rib weighing about 600kg typical weight (ahem, a wee bit more with me on it ) with 115 hp on the back, mine does about 35kt, would a shallow V hull in that sort of size/weight/hp be expected to do 40, or 50, or ???
__________________
BogMonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2006, 23:02   #4
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: solent
Boat name: wilson
Make: jeanneau merryfisher
Length: 5m +
Engine: suzuki df 70hp
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 70
i know from an engineering friend that some boats have hull speeds
ie a raggi with a 20/30 footer and a small 40hp engine may not acheive any more with a 50hp due to the hull shape,sometimes it takes a big jump to take you to the next level, if the hull can take it,not sure how to apply that theory to ribs...
__________________
antiqueboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2006, 23:04   #5
RIBnet admin team
 
Nos4r2's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: The wilds of Wiltshire
Boat name: Dominator
Make: SR5.4
Length: 7m +
Engine: Yam 85
MMSI: 235055163
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 13,069
RIBase
I think that only applies to displacement speeds or displacement hulls-planing is a different matter?
__________________
Need spares,consoles,consumables,hire,training or even a new boat?

Please click HERE and HERE and support our Trade Members.

Join up as a Trade member or Supporter HERE
Nos4r2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2006, 08:35   #6
mdt
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: fife
Make: Humber / searider
Length: 5m +
MMSI: ... - - - ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nos4r2
I think that only applies to displacement speeds or displacement hulls-planing is a different matter?
That is correct as a displacement hull is unable to rise over the bow wave it makes.

For the ones who like numbers it is
1.34 X the Square Root of the Boat's Waterline Length.

But for a hull that plains me thinks the results of the 5.5-6m speed debate show there are many more
variables to be taken into account to work out what your theoretical top speed is.
__________________
“The only difference between men and boys, is the price and size of their toys”
mdt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2006, 20:01   #7
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Lymington
Boat name: Farfetched
Make: Solent Ribs
Length: 6m +
Engine: 150hp Suzuki
MMSI: 235021048
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 963
One might be whether you take the tide into account!
__________________
brucehawsker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2006, 22:21   #8
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Farnborough
Boat name: Narcissus
Make: Cobra
Length: 7m +
Engine: Optimax 225
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,364
Hull shape is everything.
That's why all the lazy tossers without either the skill or knowledge to design their own just nick someone elses.
__________________
Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2006, 23:00   #9
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Hamble
Length: 9m +
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadMat
Hull shape is everything.
That's why all the lazy tossers without either the skill or knowledge to design their own just nick someone elses.
and they also do a range of clothing!
__________________
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt!
Dirk Diggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2006, 23:02   #10
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Farnborough
Boat name: Narcissus
Make: Cobra
Length: 7m +
Engine: Optimax 225
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,364
Are they splashproof?
__________________
Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2006, 00:45   #11
Member
 
Hightower's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Fareham
Length: 6m +
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,866
My BWM hull is said to be a deep V (mabe on the shallower side of Deep) but I recon that my Hull has a maximum hull speed of about 42 knotts. She was getting very wobbly when only slightly trimmed out at this speed when conducting prop trials.

What I did notice though was that at 4000 rpm with different sized props I was getting quite a range of various speeds. But maxed out at WOT the top end was pretty much the same.
__________________
Andy

Looks Slow but is Fast
Member of the ebay Blue RIB cover club.
Hightower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2006, 06:52   #12
Member
 
Country: Sweden
Town: Stockholm
Make: KR7
Length: 7m +
Engine: Evinrude 150 H.O
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 735
Hightower!

A "planing pad" should help you. People here say the planing pad should help you to get on plane, but we had a boat "hardhull" 21´. First we had a v8 inboard around 300hp.(50 knots), Then a outboard, johnson 225 on a bracket (53-55knots) and very wobbly. And after building a planing pad and no other chances we got 59-61 knots and no wobbling at all.
__________________
joakimhansson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2006, 08:19   #13
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Cowes
Length: 8m +
Engine: 225 Opti
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 551
How do you build a planing pad on?
__________________
Rodan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2006, 09:44   #14
Member
 
Country: Sweden
Town: Stockholm
Make: KR7
Length: 7m +
Engine: Evinrude 150 H.O
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 735
With a saw! Cut away and build a new bottom. It was a step like a stepped bottom to the planing pad. It was -94 and no pictures is aviable. I have some on the boat in my garage but it doesn´t help you. It was a friend of mine who did the work. Lenght around 120cm and wide around 15 cm. It was no problem to take sharp corners at all. Hmmmm I had to take a look in the garage after my photos.
__________________
joakimhansson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 13:56.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.