Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 22 October 2016, 15:38   #1
Member
 
Country: Ireland
Town: Donegal Bay
Make: ribtec
Length: 6m +
Engine: outboard 200hp
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 56
fuel tanks

I thought that I would open a separate thread rather than side track the spare fuel can thread. I have a 6.5m ribtec that has 2 fuel tanks in the floor each with a capacity of 150 litres. I have a 3 way valve beside the fuel filter and I can easily change between tanks as needed . I have always found this an excellent option as I never have to carry additional tanks on long cruises. I wonder why more rib manufacturers do not incorporate additional tanks in the floor. The space is there for it so it would do away with trying to secure additional tanks around the deck or within seating.
__________________
Ribtec1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2016, 16:43   #2
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: north ayrshire
Boat name: charlie girl
Make: S/R5.4/regal3760
Length: 10m +
Engine: Suzukidf70 2x6lp 315
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,985
Possibly down to cost and potential warranty issues the more simple the boat the less to go wrong and the cheaper it is to manufacture
Not much to go wrong with a 25l outboard tank on the deck
__________________
beamishken is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2016, 22:15   #3
Member
 
Last Tango's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Denny
Boat name: Highland Bluewater
Length: 6m +
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ribtec1 View Post
I thought that I would open a separate thread rather than side track the spare fuel can thread. I have a 6.5m ribtec that has 2 fuel tanks in the floor each with a capacity of 150 litres. I have a 3 way valve beside the fuel filter and I can easily change between tanks as needed . I have always found this an excellent option as I never have to carry additional tanks on long cruises. I wonder why more rib manufacturers do not incorporate additional tanks in the floor. The space is there for it so it would do away with trying to secure additional tanks around the deck or within seating.
And when (not if) one of them starts leaking you'll be left with the dilemma, after butchering the deck to get at them, do I replace the one tank that's leaking or do I replace them both. (probably no option to go to one tank because of the under deck layout).....every silver lining has a cloud.
__________________
Last Tango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2016, 10:12   #4
RIBnet admin team
 
willk's Avatar
 
Country: Ireland
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Last Tango View Post
And when (not if) one of them starts leaking
I'm sure you've had a bad run of luck with tanks. I've seen you post variations on this theme - that ALL steel tanks fail eventually. I suppose taken literally, it would be true - everything fails eventually - just as the hull will too. So I'm interested in the timescale you have in mind? 5 - 10 - 15 years? I know LOTS of 15 yo RIBS that are on their original tanks and only two that aren't. One was very badly abused and I have no history on the other. So maybe you're thinking of older craft?

To the OP:

300L is a HUGE amount of fuel in a 6.5m RIB - way more than most users would require or wish to pay for building storage for! The long range tank in a 7.4m Stormforce is 300L ! It sounds like a special order in a Ribtec - maybe for a "Round Somewhere" style trip? The upside is you will NEVER run out of fuel, so long as you don't get complacent about refilling. The downside is that you have a lot of fuel aging below deck. Fuel that you have to get on the plane every time you pull away. Fuel that your engine is running a little harder to carry about. Unless you part fill them?


P.S. Hello from a bit further North East...
__________________
.
willk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2016, 10:33   #5
Member
 
gtflash's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: southampton
Boat name: TOP CAT 2
Make: Scorpion 8.1
Length: 8m +
Engine: 250hp HO
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,827
Large tanks built in are great if you need them. Even better is separate or multiple tanks that can be isolated in the event of damage or contamination

The down side with manufactures filling every space with tanks is, if they fail or if they get filled with stuff they shouldn't it could then potentially be a drama to rectify, unless they have easy drain and cleaning facilities. My job is fixing things and when manufactures make any item without a way to service it, because it's" maintenance free" I can guarantee it will be harder to fix later.

The other down side to big tanks is the storage of lots of fuel which degrades and could collect condensation, and closer to my interest is weight Each litre of fuel ways approx 1kg. That's more weight to drag, and more importantly less speed. My mates 25ft boat gained nearly 20mph by loosing weight. He weighed all 600kg he removed on his wife's bathroom scales too
__________________
gtflash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2016, 11:59   #6
RIBnet admin team
 
willk's Avatar
 
Country: Ireland
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtflash View Post
...and closer to my interest is weight Each litre of fuel ways approx 1kg. That's more weight to drag, and more importantly less speed. My mates 25ft boat gained nearly 20mph by loosing weight. He weighed all 600kg he removed on his wife's bathroom scales too
Petrol is around 0.75kg/L - diesel closer to 0.85kg/L

I'm absolutely with you on the excess weights. I handball EVERYTHING out of the boat over the winter and reload in the spring - it's amazing what builds up. I'm guessing your mates boat wouldn't plane with the 600kg on there?
__________________
.
willk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2016, 13:48   #7
Member
 
Last Tango's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Denny
Boat name: Highland Bluewater
Length: 6m +
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by willk View Post
I'm sure you've had a bad run of luck with tanks. I've seen you post variations on this theme - that ALL steel tanks fail eventually. I suppose taken literally, it would be true - everything fails eventually - just as the hull will too. So I'm interested in the timescale you have in mind? 5 - 10 - 15 years? I know LOTS of 15 yo RIBS that are on their original tanks and only two that aren't. One was very badly abused and I have no history on the other. So maybe you're thinking of older craft?
I certainly have a bit of a jaded view about fuel tanks, not least because I fell off the boat, broke my arm and knocked my front teeth out when I was changing my tank last year. Mines was 15yrs old, the Ribeye was 9yrs old. My Fairline probably about 15 years old, Two Tremletts the same. I have had two Searays that were 20years old and still "ok" in so much as they weren't leaking but their appearance gave cause for concern. (Both aluminium tanks).
I don't count portable tanks because of the abuse I gave them but it would be interesting to poll the subject and find out others experiences.
Interestingly in both my own Coastine and the Ribeye there was no evidence of corrosion being a factor.
__________________
Last Tango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2016, 20:58   #8
Member
 
gtflash's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: southampton
Boat name: TOP CAT 2
Make: Scorpion 8.1
Length: 8m +
Engine: 250hp HO
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by willk View Post
Petrol is around 0.75kg/L - diesel closer to 0.85kg/L

I'm absolutely with you on the excess weights. I handball EVERYTHING out of the boat over the winter and reload in the spring - it's amazing what builds up. I'm guessing your mates boat wouldn't plane with the 600kg on there?
The boat did 45 ishmph before the diet... despite the v8 block
__________________
gtflash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2016, 21:21   #9
RIBnet admin team
 
willk's Avatar
 
Country: Ireland
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtflash View Post
The boat did 45 ishmph before the diet... despite the v8 block
600kg is a lot of cr@p !
__________________
.
willk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2016, 11:03   #10
Member
 
Country: Ireland
Town: Donegal Bay
Make: ribtec
Length: 6m +
Engine: outboard 200hp
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Last Tango View Post
And when (not if) one of them starts leaking you'll be left with the dilemma, after butchering the deck to get at them, do I replace the one tank that's leaking or do I replace them both. (probably no option to go to one tank because of the under deck layout).....every silver lining has a cloud.
My boat is approx 1999 and the only problems I had so far was that the fuel senders corroded which I replaced. I did have to drill an inspection hatch into the back tank to remove parts of the old sender that was blocking the fuel pipe. I would imagine that if 1 of the tanks gave trouble then I would remove it to see what the problem was. I would not remove a good tank unnecessarily.
__________________
Ribtec1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2016, 11:11   #11
Member
 
Country: Ireland
Town: Donegal Bay
Make: ribtec
Length: 6m +
Engine: outboard 200hp
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by willk View Post
I'm sure you've had a bad run of luck with tanks. I've seen you post variations on this theme - that ALL steel tanks fail eventually. I suppose taken literally, it would be true - everything fails eventually - just as the hull will too. So I'm interested in the timescale you have in mind? 5 - 10 - 15 years? I know LOTS of 15 yo RIBS that are on their original tanks and only two that aren't. One was very badly abused and I have no history on the other. So maybe you're thinking of older craft?

To the OP:

300L is a HUGE amount of fuel in a 6.5m RIB - way more than most users would require or wish to pay for building storage for! The long range tank in a 7.4m Stormforce is 300L ! It sounds like a special order in a Ribtec - maybe for a "Round Somewhere" style trip? The upside is you will NEVER run out of fuel, so long as you don't get complacent about refilling. The downside is that you have a lot of fuel aging below deck. Fuel that you have to get on the plane every time you pull away. Fuel that your engine is running a little harder to carry about. Unless you part fill them?


P.S. Hello from a bit further North East...
Hi
Yes it is a lot of fuel but only when the both tanks are full. I was told that the boat was a stand-by boat for reporters of the camel trophy race.
I normally fill the back tank and keep a 50l reserve in the front tank. Then mid season I will reverse the procedure and fill the front tank and keep a reserve in the back tank.
__________________
Ribtec1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2016, 11:27   #12
Member
 
Country: Ireland
Town: Donegal Bay
Make: ribtec
Length: 6m +
Engine: outboard 200hp
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtflash View Post
Large tanks built in are great if you need them. Even better is separate or multiple tanks that can be isolated in the event of damage or contamination

The down side with manufactures filling every space with tanks is, if they fail or if they get filled with stuff they shouldn't it could then potentially be a drama to rectify, unless they have easy drain and cleaning facilities. My job is fixing things and when manufactures make any item without a way to service it, because it's" maintenance free" I can guarantee it will be harder to fix later.

The other down side to big tanks is the storage of lots of fuel which degrades and could collect condensation, and closer to my interest is weight Each litre of fuel ways approx 1kg. That's more weight to drag, and more importantly less speed. My mates 25ft boat gained nearly 20mph by loosing weight. He weighed all 600kg he removed on his wife's bathroom scales too
Hi
Every day use the tanks would be nowhere full but for long trips whether the fuel is stored in containers on the deck or in tanks in the hull the weight will be the same.
I take the point about condensation but I have the boat for 9 years and it has not been an issue so far. I do have 1 of the old Yamahas that run on a mixture of petrol/oil/water/sand and rubber
The point regarding access is very valid. It appears on all boats there is very limited(or no) access to service/clean out tanks. Surely this should be made a priority. I mean we pay large sums for chartplotters, suspension seats, a frames etc but it appears very little thought goes to servicing a very important part of the boat
__________________
Ribtec1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2016, 13:09   #13
RIBnet admin team
 
willk's Avatar
 
Country: Ireland
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ribtec1 View Post
a frames etc but it appears very little thought goes to servicing a very important part of the boat
There should generally be an access plate built around the sender unit. This can be removed and the back of the tank inspected/pumped. Bear in mind that any decent tank will be baffled and there is only very limited access to those parts, no matter where your tank is situated.
__________________
.
willk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2016, 13:35   #14
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: S. Carolina
Boat name: D560
Make: Avon
Length: 5m +
Engine: 2016 Merc 115hp CT
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by willk View Post
300L is a HUGE amount of fuel in a 6.5m RIB - way more than most users would require or wish to pay for building storage for! The long range tank in a 7.4m Stormforce is 300L ! It sounds like a special order in a Ribtec - maybe for a "Round Somewhere" style trip? The upside is you will NEVER run out of fuel, so long as you don't get complacent about refilling. The downside is that you have a lot of fuel aging below deck. Fuel that you have to get on the plane every time you pull away. Fuel that your engine is running a little harder to carry about. Unless you part fill them?
That's a pretty common amount of fuel for a boat that size in the USA.

Kinda funny too... The Zodiac Pro Open 650 actually has two tank capacities. The French non-EPA tank has a 31 gallon (120L) capacity. The EPA tank is bigger, at 53 gallons (200L).


People here want to run out 30 - 50 miles, and back, and still have their 1/3 reserve.
__________________
Richard
Gluing geek since 2007
Opinions and intepretations expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer
office888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2016, 13:49   #15
RIBnet admin team
 
willk's Avatar
 
Country: Ireland
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by office888 View Post
People here want to run out 30 - 50 miles, and back, and still have their 1/3 reserve.
Which is compatible with a 200L (53USG) tank. 300L (79 US gallons) in a 6.5m boat is most unusual here - I was confident it was a special order
__________________
.
willk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 00:39.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.