Go Back   RIBnet Forums > RIB talk > RIBs & ribbing
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 09 August 2013, 01:43   #1
Member
 
Country: Canada
Length: no boat
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 13
Length overall vs length of rigid hull

A questions for the rib experts.
Lots of rib companies will post LOA and not actual length of the rigid hull. Is the longer the rigid hull more important than the length over all as far as seas and handling.

Lets say a longer LOA with a shorter rigid hull vs shorter over all length but a longer rigid hull, just for example lets say a 7m loa with a 5.5m length of hull vs 6.5 m loa and 5.8 length of hull, both with same beam.
__________________
hori is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2013, 16:20   #2
Member
 
Country: Canada
Length: no boat
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 13
ok..any non experts care to reply ...
__________________
hori is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2013, 16:34   #3
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Oakland CA
Length: 3m +
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,653
Any particular reason you're looking into this? I doubt you'd be able to specify the trailing length of the tubes; the front extends by some percentage of tube diameter.

Bottom line, the builder will have a LOA based on their design; doubtful you'll be able to change it.

As far as selecting a boat, that's not something I would look at; material, layout, shape, Vee angle, etc would be much higher on my list.


jky
__________________
jyasaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 19:17.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.