Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 18 September 2008, 17:50   #1
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Holbury
Make: Ocean Dynamic
Engine: 2 330 Iveco Hamilton
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 65
Sinkin Feeling

We have a New 6.3 meter Humber Rib with a 80 HP Long Shaft Yamaha.

When anchored water slops over the stern and fills the Rib. We feel there
is not enough buoyancy in the hull , or rear tube protrusion lift.

Has anybody else had this problem with Humber or any other makes.

Is there any solution to this problem ?
__________________
Tiffy
Tiffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 17:58   #2
RIBnet admin team
 
Nos4r2's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: The wilds of Wiltshire
Boat name: Dominator
Make: SR5.4
Length: 7m +
Engine: Yam 85
MMSI: 235055163
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 13,069
RIBase
I think saw that at Calshot a few weeks back?


Do you have a lot of water in the hull? Is it coming over the transom when she's head to wind at anchor?
__________________
Need spares,consoles,consumables,hire,training or even a new boat?

Please click HERE and HERE and support our Trade Members.

Join up as a Trade member or Supporter HERE
Nos4r2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 18:44   #3
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Length: no boat
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Quote:
I think saw that at Calshot a few weeks back?


Do you have a lot of water in the hull? Is it coming over the transom when she's head to wind at anchor?
Hiya,

The stern does not seem to have much lift to it. As Tiffy said protrusion of the rear Sponsons dosnt seem as good as on the new 4 meter humber Venturer Three that just entered servcie.

and yes, water Is coming in over the transom
Photos Below, 1) Humber 6.3 Ocean Pro, 2 + 3 New Venturer Three, Tubes seem to extend further compared to the larger RIB?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	100008[2].JPG
Views:	312
Size:	42.4 KB
ID:	37589   Click image for larger version

Name:	100_143556.jpg
Views:	330
Size:	54.9 KB
ID:	37590   Click image for larger version

Name:	100_14389.jpg
Views:	337
Size:	23.3 KB
ID:	37591  
__________________
Matt-V-SAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 18:48   #4
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Holbury
Make: Ocean Dynamic
Engine: 2 330 Iveco Hamilton
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 65
sinkin feeling

Below deck is dry . Water slops over the transom which is only a few inches
below water level when at anchor. Does not come over the bow ; but as
it pitches the stern goes below sea level. We also only have a 80HP engine
and the design is supposed to take much large and heavier engines.
Talking to Humber today , they suggested we should have fitted
a extra long shaft giving 5 more inches transom height . I am surprised
they did not mention this when we special ordered the Rib , if they know it
can be a problem.That perhaps all their larger Ribs should be supplied
with a extra long shaft transom . We also had a problem with the
under fuel fuel tank. The main depth was to the stern , and the filler
cap in the bow. Afloat you could not fill it full . and on the trailer
at a tilt and you then opened the front filler cap all the fuel shot out in
you face. We rectified this problem by turning the fuel tank gauge tube
into the filler , and reverting to eyeball calibrated dip stick. They also
suggested we fit a electric bilge pump with a second battery . Although
with the amount of water it takes this battery would not last long.
I noted at the Southampton Boat Show , many Ribs had self bailing
shields on the stern . Which is the way we might have to go at our cost.
Thanks for getting in touch ; and I would be interested in any other
makes of Ribs have this problem . Although they may never sit at
anchor most of the day.
__________________
Tiffy
Tiffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 19:10   #5
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Hamble
Length: 9m +
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,317
An XL would put the prop 5'' deeper in the water, it wouldn't raise the motor on the transom.
__________________
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt!
Dirk Diggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 19:21   #6
Member
 
Bigmuz7's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Glasgow
Boat name: stramash
Make: Tornado
Length: 5m +
Engine: Etec 90
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,090
I had a 5.8 hull with this problem (Northcraft), at anchor wasnt so bad when it went nose to wind,but some water still spilled in,.. but drifting could not be done, as too much entered over the dropped area where the motor was mounted. The motor was the max HP for that hull, although it was a 2 stroke, the sponsons were not big/long enough to give enough flotation, and also, I only had a single Jockey lineup in the middle of the boat, so there wasnt enough bow weight, to balance the load on the transom. In the end the transom was raised and the motor with it by a couple of inches IIRC to cure the problem, it was easily achieved and there was enough space on the motor mounting plate to raise it, also, the installer had set it too deep to start with which meant no real loss in performance was noted after the mod was done
__________________
Bigmuz7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 19:37   #7
Member
 
Pete7's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Gosport
Boat name: April Lass
Make: Moody 31
Length: 9m +
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirk Diggler View Post
An XL would put the prop 5'' deeper in the water, it wouldn't raise the motor on the transom.
Rubbish, you know what he meant

Tiffy, did you buy the hull and engine separately by chance? Why didn't you tell them what it was to be used for or even ask for advice here on Ribnet. You only had to put a post up asking for advice, its free and you get really good advice from folk that don't have a financial interest in flogging you something.

You asked which other ribs do it, one is the Deltas but they have a GRP and hyperlon skirt inside the transom to keep the slop out of the boat.

Pete
__________________
.
Ribnet is best viewed on a computer of some sort
Pete7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 19:38   #8
J S
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: N.Wales/Southampton
Make: Zodiac
Length: 3m +
Engine: Honda 15hp
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirk Diggler View Post
An XL would put the prop 5'' deeper in the water, it wouldn't raise the motor on the transom.
I thought the transom was built up higher also on humbers so you can have a high transom but have to fit an XL Engine.?

James
__________________
J S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 19:59   #9
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Warwickshire
Boat name: True Blue
Make: Humber ocean pro 6.3
Length: 6m +
Engine: Mercury 150 opti
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 456
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirk Diggler View Post
An XL would put the prop 5'' deeper in the water, it wouldn't raise the motor on the transom.
I think you may have your fact wrong there, An XL will lift your engine 5" and would of cured the problem.
__________________
Ian Sharlot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 20:14   #10
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: swansea
Boat name: Too Blue
Make: BLANK
Length: 8m +
Engine: Suzuki DT225
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Sharlot View Post
I think you may have your fact wrong there, An XL will lift your engine 5" and would of cured the problem.
How? The only thing that will stop water coming in is to have the top of the transom itself higher out of the water!!!
__________________
codprawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 20:15   #11
Member
 
Pete7's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Gosport
Boat name: April Lass
Make: Moody 31
Length: 9m +
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by codprawn View Post
How? The only thing that will stop water coming in is to have the top of the transom itself higher out of the water!!!
Doh, which would be achieved with an XL engine and a bit of 4 x 2"

Pete
__________________
.
Ribnet is best viewed on a computer of some sort
Pete7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 20:25   #12
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Warwickshire
Boat name: True Blue
Make: Humber ocean pro 6.3
Length: 6m +
Engine: Mercury 150 opti
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 456
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiffy View Post
We have a New 6.3 meter Humber Rib with a 80 HP Long Shaft Yamaha.

When anchored water slops over the stern and fills the Rib. We feel there
is not enough buoyancy in the hull , or rear tube protrusion lift.

Has anybody else had this problem with Humber or any other makes.

Is there any solution to this problem ?
Is it possible to fit a couple of pieces of stainless plate on each side of the engine to fill the gap where the water is coming over?
__________________
Ian Sharlot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 20:30   #13
Member
 
Country: Canada
Town: Tobermory, Canada eh
Boat name: Verius
Make: Zodiac Hurricane 590
Length: 5m +
Engine: Yamaha F150
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,366
Send a message via MSN to Stoo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiffy View Post
Water slops over the transom which is only a few inches below water level when at anchor.
Yowsers... You're transom is actually UNDER the water, at rest??? Is this a new boat? Has it always done this? If so, I think I would be raising H*ll with the dealer and manufacturer. The whole "point" of a boat, is to form a hole in the water where you keep your stuff...

The transom on my Hurricane is only about 4" above water at rest, but it's very buoyant and water never comes over (even with my shiny new 4-stroke) it unless I am backing up into a sea. There is also a bit of decking right there which covers a wet-bilge. The area on top of this decking is self draining.

Seriously though, this is a completely unacceptable situation and the manufacturer and dealer must figure out why it's happening. Failing that, I'd be placing a call to my lawyer...
__________________
Pump it up and RIDE!

www.wetspotimages.com
Stoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 20:32   #14
Member
 
Country: Canada
Town: Tobermory, Canada eh
Boat name: Verius
Make: Zodiac Hurricane 590
Length: 5m +
Engine: Yamaha F150
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,366
Send a message via MSN to Stoo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Sharlot View Post
Is it possible to fit a couple of pieces of stainless plate on each side of the engine to fill the gap where the water is coming over?
Undoubtedly, this could be done, but he shouldn't have to do anything! His nice new boat is sinking... If it wasn't a RIB, it would sink at the mooring... literally!

As I typed this, I recall a friend who had a small rib years ago... 4m or so. The dealer supplied a regular shaft engine by mistake, where a long shaft was required. Of course it cavitated like crazy, so the dealer's solution was to cut the transom down by several inches, leaving only an inch or two of freeboard. Even at that, water still didn't come in over the top, unless he reversed, but the scuppers and bilge bump could manage that.

Is there any chance that something like this could have happened?
__________________
Pump it up and RIDE!

www.wetspotimages.com
Stoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 21:17   #15
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Inverness
Boat name: none
Make: none
Engine: none
MMSI: none
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,908
The higher transom using an XL engine means the prop is at the same place as normal length shafts but the power head is 5" higher. The whole transom is 5" higher out the water to take account of this.
I am surprised that the transom is slopping water over at anchor, to be expected to some extent when reversing but not stationary.
I ordered the XL transom on mine having used the same hull with the standard and it is now very dry but obviously its a bit late for that solution for you now.
This is a pic of our boat with the XL transom, as you can see there is a fair amount of freeboard and the motor is a very heavy Suzuki at 185kgs so its no lightweight hanging off the stern. The motor notch if it was 5" lower would be very close to the water so I reckon even long shafts are too short for comfort on these hulls
What are Humber saying about it?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	river clyde 129.JPG
Views:	307
Size:	69.1 KB
ID:	37593  
__________________
BruceB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2008, 23:31   #16
Member
 
The Grocer's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Kildonan, Arran
Boat name: Cowal (& Bennan)
Make: Quinquari Humber/RC
Length: 6m +
Engine: Suzuki DF150/DF175x2
MMSI: 235036953
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 296
Any chance of a photo of this boat at rest? Our 6.3 OP has a 150 Suzi XL -about 220Kg- on the back, and the only water we've had to pump out has been rain (not that we get a lot of that up here... ) Then again, Cowal has 2x forward mounted 72L tanks and a 6 man liferaft at the pointy end, as well as the higher transom (but the notch for the engine is, I think, at roughly the same height as a standard transom - the higher parts are really only to deflect following seas. [An expert will be along shortly to correct this ]).

And are you really, totally, absolutely sure there's no extraneous liquid inside the hull? "Mingulay" comes to mind...
__________________
Russell
The Grocer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2008, 08:21   #17
Member
 
Cookee's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Salcombe, Devon, UK
Boat name: BananaShark
Make: BananaShark
Length: 10m +
Engine: 2xYanmar 260 diesels
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,225
If it's under warranty take it back!
__________________
Cookee
Originally Posted by Zippy
When a boat looks that good who needs tubes!!!
Cookee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2008, 19:17   #18
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Holbury
Make: Ocean Dynamic
Engine: 2 330 Iveco Hamilton
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 65
Sinkin feeling

We are going to fit a Yamaha 115 with a extra long shaft , and BHG
our local Avon and Yamaha Dealer is going to raise the transom . Hope Will
be back on service 27th September. In reply to another Posting the
Rib was specially built by Humber who knew we were going to use
it as a Training and Rescue Rib. They also knew we were going to
fit a 80 HP Yamaha 4 stroke , which is less that the maximum rated
HP. Rather surprised at this late date Humber have suggested a
extra Long Shaft . What I am wondering does only Humber's suffer
from this problem , and why do some Ribs not suffer from water
slopping over the transom .Do they have larger tubes and greater rear protusion
and more buoyancy in their hulls ?

I am rather to the conclusion from a safety point of view all
Ribs with the larger heavier 4 stroke engines should have self bailing
wells . Some of which I saw at the Southampton Boat Show.
__________________
Tiffy
Tiffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2008, 19:24   #19
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Dorset & Hants
Boat name: Streaker/Orange
Make: Avon/Ribcraft
Length: 4m +
Engine: 50Yam/25 Mariner
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,551
Its all down to design - check out the transom on the RNLI boats. They dont have one , but do have water running in , but are designed that way. Its very odd that your is so low, is there anything else that pulls the back down ? Your tubes must be virtually under water at the stern which is just not right. To pull that much bouyancy down must take a huge weight of something !
__________________
PeterM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2008, 20:02   #20
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Seattle
Boat name: Water Dog
Make: Polaris
Length: 4m +
Engine: Yamaha 60hp
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackroady View Post
Its all down to design - check out the transom on the RNLI boats. They dont have one , but do have water running in , but are designed that way. Its very odd that your is so low, is there anything else that pulls the back down ? Your tubes must be virtually under water at the stern which is just not right. To pull that much bouyancy down must take a huge weight of something !
I'm thinking the same thing. "Something is very wrong with this picture."

Honestly, before spending money I would take a picture of the boat from the rear while its in the water. Post it here so we can see what's going on and maybe offer more tailored help resolving it.
__________________
captnjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:10.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.