Quote:
Originally Posted by Bern Hanreck
Like everybody else I'm glad the OP is sorted , BUT the phrase " not fit for purpose " keeps ringing in my ears .........
I find it hard to accept that a major corporate can get away with such a sub standard component on an otherwise respected engine.......
|
I know what you mean Ben.
To be honest and looking at all the evidence...I'm inclined to think there must/may well have been a period of sub-standard casting and or material in the manufacturing of these particular saddles....which could happen for a variety of reasons as it has,and does happen in the automotive industry from time to time.
That would account for the fact it only seems the 70hp model that has suffered so many failures and conversely ...why others are Largely OK...
This is also born out by the clearly visible void/defect visible on Kernys break....which again,I reiterate was sustained on a Calm day with no excessive loading at all.
All forms of mass production from all makers have glitches and problems when quality control fails...it's just a shame that BRP have shown such a Bad attitude to their customers...and back up!...on what are after all THEIR Almost NEW products!
How long a Warranty is on an engine isn't the point IMO..
Clearly The quality of the Warranty is!