Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 25 June 2001, 10:03   #1
Member
 
Country: Greece
Town: Athens
Boat name: Sofia - Konstantina
Make: Wave
Length: 5
Engine: Outboard 2-stroke 115 Mercury
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 82
Trim Tabs

Hi,

I have a 5 meter RIB. After fitting recently
an aux engine and a second fuel tank, I feel that the balance of the boat changed and it is harder to get the boat into plane........

I am thinking of fitting trim tabs.
Will this resolve the problem, are there any side effects ?

Should the boat be specially designed in order to fit trimming tabs or is it something that you can fit on any rib ?

Thank's in advance.

Dimitris
__________________
dimitris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2001, 07:55   #2
Administrator
 
John Kennett's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Brighton
Length: 3m +
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 7,108
Dimitris

You really shouldn't need trim tabs on a RIB this size, but if all else fails they might help.

Where are the aux engine and extra fuel tank fitted? Are they right at the back of the boat? If so, relocating them forward would be the best option -- trim tabs are a poor second best to balancing the boat properly.

If that's not possible, then trim tabs are relatively easy to fit. You may find that a pair of simple fixed trim tabs would be good enough, which would save the expense and extra installation work involved with hydraulic tabs.

The drawback will be a reduction in efficiency as you will be using some of your power to dynamically balance the boat rather than push it forward.

John

------------------
John Kennett
RIBnet
__________________
John Kennett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2001, 10:55   #3
Member
 
Country: Greece
Town: Athens
Boat name: Sofia - Konstantina
Make: Wave
Length: 5
Engine: Outboard 2-stroke 115 Mercury
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 82
Thanks for the advice.

Yes, they are both fitted at the back of the boat.

I will try to rellocate the fuel tank.

Is there a limitation in the distance between the fuel tank and the aux. engine ?

Can I use a fuel pipe bigger than the one provided with the aux engine ?

Thanks again

Dimitris
__________________
dimitris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2001, 15:49   #4
Administrator
 
John Kennett's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Brighton
Length: 3m +
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 7,108
Quote:
Is there a limitation in the distance between the fuel tank and the aux. engine ?
Probably. But you're unlikely to reach the limit in a 5 metre RIB!
Quote:
Can I use a fuel pipe bigger than the one provided with the aux engine ?
Can't think of any reason why not . . .

John

------------------
John Kennett
RIBnet
__________________
John Kennett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2001, 02:54   #5
Member
 
Country: Canada
Town: sidney b.c.
Make: Hurricand 630
Length: 6m +
Engine: Suzuki DF 225
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 50
i own a zodiac pro 550 (5.5 meter) and researched trim tabs on the bennet trim tab web site. i built a set of fixed tabs and i notice that the boat lands softer when coming off a wave. i also found that i can plane at a lower speed however my top speed remained the same. chris
__________________
zod550 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2001, 09:04   #6
Trade member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Yeovil, Somerset
Boat name: Ribcraft1
Make: Ribcraft
Length: no boat
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75
Send a message via Skype™ to jace
Dimitris

I would agree with John, You shouldn’t need trim tabs on a boat this size. Better weight distribution is the key to trimming a smaller boat.

Try fitting a pair of Outboard Hydrofoils to your engine; these are plastic wings that bolt on to the outboard cavitation plate. Not needed to use them myself but people who I’ve talked to that have fitted these reckon there very good. Better pull out/Lift and more stability. Might be worth trying, cheaper and easier to fit than trim tabs.
jace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2001, 14:11   #7
Member
 
Country: Greece
Town: Athens
Boat name: Sofia - Konstantina
Make: Wave
Length: 5
Engine: Outboard 2-stroke 115 Mercury
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 82
Thank's again all of you, especially to John for maintaining such a site.

I think I've got the message "Weight Distribution".

If that fails on my boat, I'll try the Outboard Hydrofoils .

As a final option I'll try fixed tabs.

Dimitris

__________________
dimitris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02 July 2001, 04:15   #8
Member
 
Country: Canada
Town: cowichan valley
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 70
try raising your motor so that the prop is at least level with the bottom of your hull. this will increase the trim a bit as well as your top speed. for every inch in height you gain about 500 rpm. you will need to try different props. some props like mercs laser will help keep the back end down where as the mirage prop will add lift.
__________________
eksrae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2001, 08:10   #9
Member
 
Country: Greece
Town: ATHENS
Boat name: SUN KISS II
Make: Nuova Bat 9 Falcon -
Length: 5m +
Engine: Outboard Mercury 115
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 639
Send a message via Skype™ to batfalcon
Dimitris, I suppose you are Greek too. Try to put some heavy loads at the bow. I own a Bat 9 Falcon X and the first thing I did was to put an inox fuel tank as near as possible to the front. That gave me the result by two ways. First I unloaded the stern by 110 kg and secondly I loaded the bow with the same weight. I carry an auxiliarry engine as you do at the back of the boat, but since the "better weight distribution" everything seams to be normal. I also suggest that you might build an adaptor from your main fuel tank to the second engine. That will give you the advantage NOT to carry the extra tank.
Michael
__________________
batfalcon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2001, 23:49   #10
Member
 
Country: UK - N Ireland
Town: Bangor
Make: Shakespeare
Length: 7m +
Engine: O/b 225
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 188
It might not take very much weight removed from the sternto help your problem. We recently did RB4 and suffered the whole time from exactly the same problem simply because the console & seats were a few inches too far back. Adding weight at the front was only marginal help as it became even harder to get on the plane because of the marginal engine size (50HP). When we got back home I emptied out the back locker (about 80kg) and the boat was so much better. When I removed the spare fuel load at the bow (about 80kg) the problem was back, albeit less severe. I then moved the console and seats 9 inches forward and it is now like driving a different boat.
__________________
Alan Mckewan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2001, 13:27   #11
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Great Harwood, Lancs
Boat name: Tigger II
Make: Bombardier Aerodeck
Length: 3m +
Engine: Tohatsu 25HP
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 626
I have had a similar problem with a 4.8M Ribcraft and 50HP. I now carry the spare fuel tank strapped to the front of the console and the outboard in a foam cradle at the bows. If i ever need them i move them to the transom as planing would not be an option on the aux engine anyway. This made a hugh diference getting onto the plane with especialy with heavy loads.
__________________
Garygee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 21:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.